Very interesting concept but many games have very interesting concepts. It’s the execution and gameplay that’ll decide whether this is truly a great game or just “another one of them”.
Very interesting concept but many games have very interesting concepts. It’s the execution and gameplay that’ll decide whether this is truly a great game or just “another one of them”.
True. But being familair with a platform and OS and understanding “...additional SDK or API usage...” doesn’t guarantee success either. Ask the millions of failed devs on mobile platforms who understand and are familiar with the platform. One of the biggest problems a dev faces is exposure. How do you make a name for…
Yeah I agree. It would be a flop if it’s not made with the platform in mind. Good thing Nintendo is reknown for making games that suit whatever platform they decide to develop for.
Yeah, but you’re comparing a dedicated games device with about 55million install base to a mobile game with more than a billion install base. If animal crossing makes that transition and Nintendo market it right, it could be the next big mobile game.
“Goodwill”? What are you talking about? So now Nintendo earns goodwill by releasing good games? And what about all the other companies that release broken piles of cow dung? What do they get? I’ll tell you: a lot of moaning but still people buy their shit and their games continue to dominate the charts. Nintendo…
This is exactly the reason I respect Nintendo. When they go into something, they usually have a plan and always try to think outside the box. There’s a strong desire for unique content that a lot of people don’t appreciate. How easy would it have been to make a Mario game with shitty touch screen controls and call it…
Didn’t the animation company responsible for this go bust recently? Couldn’t that have been the reason for the abrupt ending?
If you mean all the mediocre visual novels and jrpgs, then yeah, your report is spot on!
Mate, you hit the nail right on it’s head. I’ve been saying this from Day One. Sony didn’t have a plan for the Vita. They thought they’d beef up the PSP, give a 2nd analogue, slap on a touch screen and back touch pad, and sit back and watch the money roll in. Well, we all know how that went.
Mate, you said it exactly like I’ve been saying it. I really don’t understand how this is still an issue for some with the ridiculously low prices of external hard drives and USB sticks. My 500gb ps4 had been full for months so I have to change hard drives. For a WiiU, I reckon a 250gb hard drive would be plenty if…
I don’t understand why this is still somewhat of an issue. If you do download games a lot, then you’ll definitely need more storage. And with the prices of hard drives plummeting all the time, I really don’t understand why this is still being brought up. My ps4 came with a 500gb hard drive but guess what? It’s not…
Can you guys just stop with the whole “Vita is great for remote play” cos it’s only a half truth. Yes, you can remote play on the Vita with little or no lag but there’s just no denying how bad it is for any title that uses L2, R2 and God forbid, L3 and R3. Plus, the analogues on the Vita just don’t do the job in any…
Can you guys just stop with the whole “Vita is great for remote play” cos it’s only a half truth. Yes, you can…
Unless you don’t use L2, L3, R2 and R3, then no, this IS a bad perk cos most games are unplayable otherwise. Nice to look at but not functional.
I think what we really need agree on is what actually constitutes a “kids game”.
It’s never going to happen. Sony just can’t take a gamble like that. They only just returned to profitability so there’s no way they’re going to take some of that and put it into an already sunken ship.
I agree with all your points and I think it’s worth mentioning that your 2nd point is something Vita faithfuls will never see/admit too.
The internet is crawling with people who are just itching to align themselves with something they believe to be intelligent. I wouldn’t be surprised if they read that comment and thought “Wow! Mind blown. Must give like.”
Hahahahaha, good one mate. You haven’t taught me anything new, but you certainly made me laugh:)
I’m either about to learn something totally new from you, or I’ve just come across the most incredible bit of bs. Please point me in the direction of your source that proves that “your wielding” is how you formally refer to someone wielding a phone. I’m very, very interested. I’ve come across “in your wielding” as in…
Dude, that’s wayyyyyy to personal. Calm down! It’s just a freaking phone! No need to take it personally. Smh