Yeah, okay.

I will admit that was an exaggeration.

I don't get your problem.

Oh, boo. I wanted so to learn the story of how the things were made. Well, now it's just not as fun.

Thank you for this wonderous information. (booking tickets as we speak.)

Griffith worked out that she was best when she was doing a Judy Holliday riff. It worked with her very well, I think.

Whatever.

There will always be idiots who mistake drama for intimacy.

Don't be fooled! Everyone of them gave "I did it...and I'd do it again!" realness.

Look, if you're over her, then just move on. Letting everybody know how "over" she is and "over her" you are, is really just you being a lameass who wants to hear someone agree with you so you can feel like you spoke truth to power and the rest of us are sheeple who don't get it.

Usually I'm the first to defend indie fashion.

What aren't you getting?

You obviously can't read or comprehend what I wrote. Nothing in your bitchy small-minded response speaks to a single thing I wrote and shows a complete lack of understanding as to what I clearly expressed.

Hey, dipshit, go read something besides the back of a Jergens bottle. It can take decades, even in a bull market, to recover the losses of one major downturn.

So Jamie Dornan's going to be the male version of Carré Otis in "Wild Orchid"? With the same career-destroying outcome?

Meanwhile, in the greenroom of "The Today Show"...

THANK YOU. Every time one of these stories comes up, some people go on and on about manipulation and showboating.

And, if you're in a good relationship, your partner will know that about you.

Like so many things, it depends. Not knowing this couple, I can only speculate.

9 percent? Annually? For 33 years?