see previous/post comments...and happy new year to you. after all 2017 is the year of the cock.

how about the cronut vs the cruffin ??

and no one is forcing you to defend them and shit. Not sure who the fragile snowflake is in this situation, me for making an observation on a bloggers politcally slanted article or you for thinking I was whining and shit. I mean I get the idea of taking a comment and turning it for another use and shit but in this…

cheep

I didnt request nor do I require a safe zone, just pointing out a bloggers political slant to an unrelated topic. But thanks for playing, here is your parting gift........

How about “the candidate who would not have appointed anti-science people to science-related government positions did not get elected” - seeing as how Mr. Trump appointed climate change deniers and evolution deniers?

............tell me again how you are not a liberal or a troll??

You honestly think climate change is an important part of what made 2016 bad, that right there negates all statements made by you in this discussion, like I said before, people can not be this dumb, but you continue to prove that idea wrong. The only one skipping out on reality in this case seems to be you. As I…

I have no idea how things will work out, I am just pointing out that the blogger put a useless political slant on a story about an not even close miss of a comet. For all I know Trump’s hair is more sentient than he is and eventually we will all be part of the sub plot from the movie Idiocracy....just FYI...I would…

Climate change...ummm that story is old (it was first bought to attention way before Gore’s slide show back in the 1800's) and no where close to anything import to the history of 2016. In fact it only became more of an issue following the results of the lesser of two evils election. And you are lying to yourself if…

nice try by the way, but I am not clicking on your link.

the cake is a lie

I do, the writer of this article doesnt seem to realize that...hence my comments on the article.

I do not require a safe zone, but nap with a blankie always sounds good. Of course now I also see all the libratrolls have come out to play as well. 

“sorry it didn’t suit your tastes.” sounds so condescending. Instead of objective reporting about a comet, the author has to slant the article with a small yet obvious political diatribe. All this article is missing is a safe zone and a blankie; not for the not-even-close-miss of a comet but for the non-stop…