“public vomit mishaps and poop jokes. That’s your bread and butter.”

They actually finished 2nd in 1992/3.

Shorter Randy Lerner:

If that’s what you want, fine by me.

Are we all down with Jean Girard being a “bad guy”? Have you got a problem with gay, French, F1 guys, who are also Katie Couric wannabes?

Yet another risk posed by Rio’s shit-filled ocean.

Johnny Jonathan - that’s longhand for rubber-dick, right?

In America, ride hoverboard on street to building. In Russia, ride hoverboard on building to street!

Drew is The Convert.

This is the maths.

Clearly a big fan of the Cardinals SS

I agree the comedy/entertainment value of the game went from 0/10 to 7/10 with this one incident. But the pain quotient went up too.

was only made less painful

imagining a world where Drumpf speaks truth to Rex Ryan:

Goddamnit, kids adults these days

Shorter Billy:

Your first comment is absurd.

Saying “X is justified” - whether by the profit motive or anything else - is making a moral argument.

They aren’t. Argument 1 is an amoral explanation for why people take godawful jobs. Argument 2 is a moral argument, which posits that because Argument 1 is true, it’s both ok that godawful jobs exist, and that they can be exploited.

Who said it’s incorrect? (It’s axiomatic, and often used to explain urbanization in developing countries, but I digress.)