No, it just took this long because it literally takes years to gather sufficient evidence for a case such as this. Not only that, the major exchanges got loads of promotion from trusted names in politics, finance, and media, which made it even harder to question the legality and integrity of these companies.

No one is forcing you or any other American into an EV.

I recall hearing that Tim wasn’t particularly pleased with all of the compromises that they had to make with the unit, and that it’s not really living up to the original vision.

You guys are scraping the bottom of the barrel these days. Get help.

How many of those jobs are going to come back once these companies realize that AI chatbots aren’t ready to replace humans?

Personally I never enjoyed getting coding advice from Stack Overflow. The answers can be very insightful, but there’s no guarantee that your questions will be answered. With AI you can continually ask it for help and it will still make a guess even when it gets stumped.

This is such a dumb premise and reeks of fear mongering.

Have you considered that there may be other reasons for researching life extension? Scientists want this research to grow as well and have multiple aims for this sort of research, such as:

Corporate world does not control the trajectory of AI, they only control the models they own. They cannot stop the proliferation of open source models, which have already have surpassed the capabilities of proprietary models. Literally today anyone can download a ChatGPT-like model for free and run the inference on…

you’re still feeding off others’ work

What about the artists that enjoy using this tech? For them it speeds up their workflow and allows them to make bigger, grander works of art.

Before the Internet it was quite normal to not be able to rewatch previously aired content. If it wasn’t being taped by the producers or the audience, it was effectively gone forever after airing.

AI is no more creative than the humans labeling the data and writing the prompts. The AI generated image attached to the article is positively awful, and a great case in point.

As it stands, the episode encapsulates the state of AI discourse today—a confused conversation that cycles between speculative fantasies, hyped up Silicon Valley PR, and frightening new technological realities—with most of us confused as to which is which.

They approved it

What a pointless recommendation. These services exist to serve people that don’t have bank accounts. Typically they either don’t want a bank account, or don’t qualify for one.

What an idiot. Never, ever write something disparaging about your employer on the employer’s property. It’s like painting “capitalism sux” on a single brick in the side of the headquarters. It doesn’t matter if you’re right, and doesn’t matter if the expression is so small that it takes a long time for anyone to…

If I have, say, a McDonald’s craving while I’m out walking and don’t want to enter the arctic AC-pumped dining room (or the dining room of the 24-hour location is already closed)

I can imagine tons of people using this feature to get in and out of tight parking spaces. Within months the Costco parking lots will look like well-worn drift racing tracks.

This trend of expanding album covers with AI is pointless