“You keep using that word. I don’t think it means, what you think it means.”

Followed up by, "they want all these people to move here and vote for them." Last I checked, voter fraud is very low and you have to be a citizen to vote. 

They'll need to keep it simple, "no money for Trump" might get his attention.

I'm actively looking for a new job, so I give many less fucks than normal. So, while I sympathize with them, I'm still forced to show you daily. 

I think you mean how all the middle class and poor Americans get fucked. That's the infuriating part, it's like a regressive tax. It will hurt the people who need it the most. 

As a Steelers fan, I’m used to Brady being Brady and stomping them in the fourth quarter. I was expecting them to go down, score, go for two, and win. He’s not looked like himself most of the year. And today, the Steelers were getting enough pressure on him to (uncharacteristically) make some bad throws (including…

I think what he meant to say was, “If you senators would just somehow make things worse, then maybe less people will try to come here. I mean, we’re doing our best to kill their kids, and treat the ones who survive as bad as we can get away with, but we still have people trying to cross the border.”

Alternate take: keep inviting him and make sure Mueller has his DVR set.

That's just crazy talk!

I think part of the problem of 2016 was the feeling that Hillary was owed her chance. I am not convinced Biden would have beat her for the nomination, but it would have been close.

When I was in high school, this was also known as "whoever smelt it, dealt it". And that seems to fit in many ways.

Can we ask Scott Walker to draw that Venn diagram? 

Don't feel too bad. I'm old enough to not know who any of those people are and remember mTV for showing videos (like Money for Nothing by Dire Straits).

And by red state, you mean Soviet Russia?

ProPublica’s podcast has been on top of this for awhile. Not at all surprised. That Wolkoff was concerned about the blatant graft is telling!

They’re susceptible to graft, corruption, and poor management like many organizations. I generally like trade/guild unions, although they’ve had their own storied history of racism, sexism, and most other -isms. Which, when it’s a closed shop, denies employment to swaths of people.

That’s how I understand it too. However, they already struck out the individual mandate. So, if it was inseparable, then they passed a law that made another law unconstitutional. And you’re not supposed to be able to do that.

Who could have expected that a guy written up for fraud while in the elite Navy Seals would continue to grift? Also, I won't be surprised if Zinke found out he's leaving by the end of the year when everyone else did by Trump's tweet.

Wtf with North Korea and the economic opportunities? I thought we weren’t worried about building Trump Tower NoKo and were worried about him nuking Denver. Did I miss that? 

The ruling makes no sense. Republicans have already repealed the mandate, and left the law in place. I don't see how you can then argue the mandate makes the rest of the law invalid and unconstitutional.