earlgreyornone
EarlGreyOrNone
earlgreyornone

No, because reality shows aren’t documentaries. While documentary filmmakers try to avoid influencing the events they are recording, reality shows are somewhat scripted and events are actively influenced by the producers to increase entertainment value.

I’d think the main ussue would be the over serving, if anything

If it seemed like someone was too drunk to consent, wouldn’t it be any witnesses duty and responsibility to stop it from going any further?

This is from an Us article:

This article is honestly kind of strangely written/unclear but the only thing I can think of (legally) is if this was not consensual...hence producer filing as third party. Though this is obviously speculation. Not a lot about this seems to make sense otherwise.

Because people seem to have arbitrarily picked on Who as a show that deserves to be especially castigated for it, for some reason.

Or, it could be that gender-swapping as a trope is a generally terrible idea on top of being mechanically difficult to pull off.

But not the male ones for some reason. They get a free pass at a blank slate.

River Song is not a time lord.

Because it’s silly to think an enlightened non-human would lock his image into forever to one sex. Personally, if I was going to live thousands of years I would not mind spending some decades or even centuries as a woman and a mother. If he’s going to choose to regenerate into a man repeatedly then he needs to give us

i mean, it’s evolutionary biology, which is a best guess pretty much, so it’s as likely to be true as to be not true?

Yeah, that’s A Thing. It’s called “genital echo theory.” Some researchers think it’s the same reason full lips —especially with red lipstick— are considered sexually attractive.

You’re missing the point. I can think the 3rd toe on your left foot is attractive, but forcing you to wear closed toed shoes all the time because I don’t feel like I can control myself around feet is backwards and idiotic.

No. Woman have the right to do whatever they want with their boobs, but don’t tell me what I can and can not find attractive about a woman. I respect and love my wife, and I also can’t get enough of her blessed by angels perfect tits. Don’t tell me I shouldn’t or am bad for feeling that way.

You might not have noticed, but the Doctor is rebooted as a new character every few years. Why are people demanding a female Doctor? Because it would be a perfect direction for the show to go! Moffet’s grasping at straws to come up with a non-sexist explanation of why we just can’t have one says more about him than it

Better yet, bring back The Rani. She was definitely The Doctor’s equal in intelligence. You also have Romana and The Doctor’s granddaughter Susan around somewhere or bring in a new female Time Lord.

Remaking the character is the entire point of the show. An actor quits and a new one comes on. Why can’t the new actor simply be a woman? As for the “why dont you make new female characters?”

Those must be the same people who claim pissing/shitting are analogous to breastfeeding. AKA don’t do it in public.

Fun fact(that may or may not be made up if it is I apologize) scientists think that we started showing clevage to imitate buttocks which show when a female is ready to mate in most primate species. Humans are also the only primate whose mammary glands can produce milk regardless of whether or not the female is