Completely agree. If the headline had said “Wonder Woman about to kick...” I wouldn’t have had the same reaction as you did. It’s shoddy headlining.

I noticed that too. I wonder if it falls under the “it’s not out of the theaters yet so we’re certain it’ll make that mark by Tuesday, so we’ll go ahead and call it good” category.

Yaaaaay! Lookit that little arm chub! She’s getting there! I’m so glad to see your updates and that she’s rockin’ the almost-regular-sized diapers already!

Posting to increase the visibility of this.

Nah, see, these are the unspoken rules.

Fusion drew clearer parallels in their similar article, but it makes for a rather stark juxtaposition with her recently and well promoted book about working women and how they can have it all if they just do Ivanka-approved things, all of which is basically a pack of nice-sounding lies evidently built on the back of…

Can’t blame her. If it were me I’d find a way to put all of my secret service between us and would probably be doing my best to be on the other side of that crowd.

I’ve never heard of this brand before, and after reading the article, have no interest in trying it. Real Ice Cream Wins Out.

I read that as “bro-choice.”

That’s pretty much where I am as well. We passed the point of no return some time ago, the only thing now we can do is attempt to mitigate, and yet it’s still being treated as some sort of “debatable” situation.

Nah, men can’t help themselves, why hold them to any standard of basic humanity? This is about punishing women just for being women, anyway, so why get in the way of that with distractions?

Would 100% watch.

I’m finding it difficult to muster up much sympathy about this because I’m already fairly sure Fox wouldn’t kick anyone to the curb if they didn’t think they could gain by it.

Scroll up to Betty Wycombe’s post. WA was literally listed on The Hill’s article when I checked - it genuinely was there - and now it’s not there and the count is down by one. The Hill mis-reported, and I didn’t catch the edit in time to edit my own post. Yeah, apparently she’s thinking about it. SIGH.

I know, it literally was on the list and then twenty minutes later, it wasn’t. Apparently the News Tribune article says she’s “thinking about it”. UGH.

I’m somewhat stunned. Not least of which because I just learned there’s a National Association of Secretaries of State.

The linked article from The Hill lists Washington state, yes, but only waaaaay down at the bottom in the summary of all the states. It’s incredibly easy to miss and I only found it because I CTRL + F’ed for “Washington”.

Unsure about who exactly controls WA State’s voter rolls - cursory research directed me to the Secretary of State website with no obvious information on a Board of Elections. Still, that’s a pretty dumbass move toward Illinois, at the very least. They’re so clueless.

The best part to me is that’s a presumptive “go soak your head.” It says up front they haven’t actually received any letter yet, but on the chance that they do, hell to the no.

I was pretty sure our state was going to be on the voter information denial list, since Washington’s been quite willing to push back against this administration, but I’m glad to see it confirmed. I wish the number was higher than 22, but that’s a pretty good response after one day.