I’m not arguing about the success or how fast UGR’s vehicles are. It’s just comparing a UGR Gallardo to a Koenigsegg, is ridiculous. UGR’s service is far behind that of Koenigsegg. Koenigsegg’s warranty is also 50% longer. I’m also unaware of what Koegnigsegg’s Regera is putting out on pump gas, but regarding a Agera,…

What ones of those twin turbo Gallardos pass emissions standards in both the US and Europe? What ones are putting out those numbers on pump gas? What ones come backed with a full warranty and top notch service should something go wrong (which means, an entire mechanic and engineering team comes to your door)?

Hasn’t it been said that for some reason a stick won’t fit? That’s why the Challenger is available with a stick, and the Charger isn’t, even though they are basically siblings.

But... but... no manual.

Would you buy it over a Chevy SS?

By the time the 4.7 came out, the Prowler had been on sale for two years.

Found the ignorant fella. Now, please explain why it was bad and all the better automatics that existed for the application.

What ones of those V8 engined cars meet crash standards of the time? Emissions standards? The emissions is a big one because the V8 Chrysler was using at the time was only used in trucks and SUV’s that had a high enough weight to get them out of the passenger vehicle classification for emissions standards.

Plus you could bone in the back, without having to remove any seats!

The transmission was damn impressive. The manual shift was pretty damn fast, even for today’s standards (if you rule out dual-clutches). Four gears was the norm back then. Automatics with more gears really only came in buses and really high end stuff.

And how are they getting that to fit under the hood? You’ve also added a bunch more weight ruining the 50/50 weight distribution, for not much gain in performance. Plus I don’t believe the Autostick transmission would have mated up to the V8 at easily, but don’t hold me to it since the transmission was in the back.

Nah, not really. All the V8's they had were truck engines (and competitive ones at that). They didn’t make a true sports car (V10 Viper excluded) at that time so they didn’t have a need for a V8 that would be appropriate.

Every Magnum left in my area has ugly 22" wheels, probably bits of LED strip lights, tinted windows, and different color passenger and driver doors.

The V6 was better than any V8 they had at the time, and only the first year had 200 hp. They upped it to 250 for later years.

Saab 93. Something about it is just wrong, but it looks so damn good.

That doesn’t mean you are protected from all the risks.

Because housing isn’t an investment.

If people weren’t grandfathered in, yes.

1) People need to stop thinking housing is an investment. It can be, but it should primarily be a place to live.

Shitting all over Saab’s attempt, yet it came out with a relatively viable prototype nearly 20 years ago, and it wasn’t nearly as complex as this one... that you claim is better. It was also done on a comparatively small budget (GM wasn’t too exited about all of this, and therefore didn’t fork over much cash).