dubium--disqus
dubium
dubium--disqus

@avclub-e3f5ab7f02122f95b801e13e2c586d6a:disqus Yes, of course i am. I left you an open goal there didn't i? :)

@avclub-e3f5ab7f02122f95b801e13e2c586d6a:disqus Just to clarify there is a difference between defending apartheid and questioning if anything actually got better when apartheid was removed. Not that anyone cares i guess.

@avclub-41e23e24ee2670c4128cd7e5e5ee42ab:disqus I deeply, deeply do not care about, and reject, those "human rights" as stated in the declaration and generally most other similar humanist/marxist crap all these blubbering idiots have invented and forced upon us since 1945. I do not recognize any of all that. I am

That sounds like liberal infestation. Scary. Good though then that Putin did not sign a law against homosexuals in the olympics, right? :)

I can not help what you read into it, YES i am not fond of liberals but i do not use the word as a synonym for bad. The bad part is what you guys read into it on your own i do not know what your issues are. Self-hate?

@avclub-410987637793620466d1b0732bd7ed6d:disqus You guys have a mystifying definition of "free" and also of "speech." And yes, it is a very uncomfortable ride in these dark times.

@avclub-e6c1142acfaceea3982a09641b33fc04:disqus Thank you very much for your civilized debate! :)

Thank you for a good post, you are right on some points, wrong about something and on some points i just do not agree but that is matter of taste more than right or wrong. It is impossible for me to answer every person here in great detail there are very many of you. :)

They signed a law targeting something that SOME gay people says (or does). The target was not gay people, and not something ALL gay people says or does. Therefore you can not call it an attack on (all) gay people. That is like saying all criticism on Westboro Baptist Church is an attack on "all white people" and also

@avclub-1982161d0fe636d1caabd47a2ac23e12:disqus

@avclub-1982161d0fe636d1caabd47a2ac23e12:disqus The baltic states joining the EU is Russias business because EU=NATO=USA. It is a military security problem. EU is the new Soviet Union, which is allied with every other potential enemy for Russia. So it is kind of like when the USSR put military and nukes and whatever

People, i said be clear about what domestic means. Georgia was not a domestic issue, when Russia starts shooting at some village full of american at the border i would not mind if NBC and president Obama had stuff to say about that. The baltics joining EU is not domestic either, and not the stuff they talk about in

Yes, i write tons of "rayciss" and "nazi" and "extremist" post in both languages and in various places. You want me to copy-paste-translate all of them? :)

So they have done wrong other times too, two wrongs do not make a right.

I call liberals liberal because that is what they are. I really do not know what to call them if not what they are. If you feel being a liberal is so bad and wrong you take the word as an insult that is not my problem. This place is just as it use to be, some guy whines that i call liberals liberal like you, seven

Give me ONE example of when Russia has even had an opinion on any domestic issue in any other country. Russia has military and economic strategic interests, YES. They care if something affects them in that way or is a direct threat to them. But they do not give a shit of a country wants to have a gay parade or

1. The law is not "horrifying" by any means, and does not target homosexuals either. The law targets specific forms of propaganda material, not necessarily printed or endorsed by gay people either. Not even all gay people are comfortable with the spreading of that kind of material, and it is basically racism and

Yeah but then Mike should atleast ask himself why Briggs didn't ask him why he followed him, right? I thought he followed him that obviously because he was SURE that bag was full of drugs, so he thought it didn't matter to be discrete any more. As if he was on his way to arrest Briggs. Apparently that was not the case.

I thought "well how is Mike getting out of this one" at the end of last episode, then this episode starts with Briggs just blurting out his biggest secrets. Wouldn't the first thing Briggs would/should say be, why the F are you following me Mike? Instead he did not mention it at all except for that "you are a hard man

Yes, i agree they can keep the night. Don't they know the freaks come out at night?