Notice it’s all girls in this game. The 15-year-old boys showed up already suffering from arm fatigue
Notice it’s all girls in this game. The 15-year-old boys showed up already suffering from arm fatigue
A computer which Affleck’s character bought her, along with the fact that he has donated literal millions to that charity that her dad runs. They are essentially working WITH each other opposed to one of them working for the other. I feel like at least 1/4 of these questions can be answered by simply paying close…
Yeah, every critique of it I’ve read has been perfectly valid. Still liked it.
But I still didn’t hate it, fight me.
Wasn’t that just him cocking the gun?
But that was just a stupid ole’ cow...
The Spurs could probably have made up 4 foreign-sounding names and traded their draft rights for Boogie on reputation alone.
Now, tell me again—was it this man with an 8-figure net worth who hit you, or his broke-on-paper friend?
NFL doctors agree the two men are not suffering from concussions.
Maybe quit kicking your nephew in the stomach, dick.
Can you “ruin” a car that was shit to begin with?
I will never not think of this when I see him playing from now on. And next time I do, I will tell my 5th grader “See that guy? He honestly believes the earth is flat.” Cant wait for her reaction.
Oiy. OK! The original allure of Lamborghini doors was due to the fact that they were attached to a fucking Lamborghini! FFS!
Maybe in this case, actually #sticktosprots
It seems unlikely you’d see much savings. The Queen Elizabeth class lacks catapults and nuclear reactors, making it significantly less capable, but still cost around $4B apiece. Charles de Gaulle, which has those features, but is less than half the size of a US supercarrier cost $5-6B in 2017 dollars (and has its own…
I could handle him touching a woman’s ass if it was consensual. He was taking her damned temperature! And if that’s consensual, super. Do it in private.
oh man, the overt ass grab in the background behind him is....bordering on presidential.
This “kids know what’s best for themselves” logic is so foreign to me. I only hear it from parents whose children prefer them to their exes, and people who believe that a childhood with elements of severe, dangerous dysfunction is a universal experience. So they’re either operating as an interested party…
That assumes the child is making an actual choice and not being manipulated by one parent. In an ideal world sure. But if the parent or parents are manipulators it’s not really the child’s choice.