dsklr--disqus
dsklr
dsklr--disqus

100% agree on maher, but not on your milo point. maher's always been about debate, and has always tried to make sure different viewpoints have a voice on his show. when something like 30%+ of the country mostly agrees with milo, what's the case against having him on (again, taking into consideration the format of the

you don't view him as a relevant figure in the current political landscape?

'member the one with the dumb kids in dash rendar's ship?

i can get behind that ranking, except for III being on the wrong side of that chasm. or maybe two chasms are needed, but the VI -> III quality dropoff is absolutely the biggest on this list.

i thought mads mikkelsen delivered his hologram message so powerfully and convincingly that had no problem at all buying what, yeah, could have seemed like a cheesy retcon otherwise. that and the fact that it actually made a lot of sense.

this criticism seems overly reverential to me, and very preoccupied with the preferences of a dead guy. people don't seem to worry about artistic misplacings of tchaikovsky's 1812 overture in modern media. I get that there could be some concerns if it's done for a crap movie and people literally can't tell that the

people being assholes. thanks for not disappointing!

yeah, no, implication and reveal are two very separate concepts.

he doesn't strike me as in denial in this review. actually endorses william = MiB if i'm not misreading.

that's not what "confirmation" means, though.

his discussions of race that are so useful would make the social justice crowd's heads explode in 2016. same with the way he talks about women. offending people is an art in stand up comedy, and the criticism of things he's said about women seems weird and selective- never mind that he's said all kinds of ridiculous

bit of an idiot? cool take for one of the most culturally insightful comedians of all time.

violence almost anywhere in the world is dramatically lower than "your day", as has been the story of the modern world. and research largely shows that exposure to violent video games decreases, not increases, violent tendencies in people. not the first to say this but you really need to reevaluate those claims you're

okay, he's *entertaining the possibility* that it, unlike christianity, might not be worthy of irreverence. i don't think you need to be a religious scholar to realize that's ridiculous.

so like, he's just assuming that islam might actually be awesome, while poking fun at christianity all day?

i think you think that's a bad thing, and i think you wouldn't want to say that in front of gary oldman, phillip seymor hoffman, paul giamatti, etc.

thanks for clarifying. my understanding was that the bill was intended to protect religious institutions from troll-ish lawsuits when they refused to perform gay weddings or hire gay priests- which is the kind of ideological strong-arming that's driving the right straight into trump's arms lately (along with the

believe the bill targeted religious institutions, not businesses. fine to have the same opinion, but let's not pretend it's the exact same issue. for that reason it feels like disney was being a little dramatic here.

they're obviously re-posting funny amazon reviews, smug guy.

they are off by a week. which, given barry's lines in last night's arrow, gives me an interesting theory on what might go down in the flash finale.