i meant insulting to them. they're legends and still pretty damn good today. the funniest i've seen of amy schumer rarely even approaches rock/chappelle's weaker stuff.
i meant insulting to them. they're legends and still pretty damn good today. the funniest i've seen of amy schumer rarely even approaches rock/chappelle's weaker stuff.
you calling chappelle and chris rock "counterparts" of amy schumer is insulting.
and then they're shocked when people actually gravitate towards trump and milo despite their terrible opinions, because it turns out they get these clicks by being very entertaining.
oh for sure. i generally like jeremy scahill, but he got more attention after backing out of this episode's panel than he did at the height of the iraq war. make no mistake, everybody is hungry for some of those milo clicks, regardless of how much they can't stand him.
i don't know. seems like a lot of people are interested in him. i certainly am, and i don't remember the last time that i saw an avclub article with 1300 comments.
based on your internet traffic, you guys are unquestionably an authority on irrelevance! http://www.alexa.com/sitein…
literally the article is about his "irrelevance." you would be remiss not to talk about the size of his audience.
well duh, that's like "dealing with being embarrassment on the internet 101"
well you sure proved you're not frothing, mr. man who's angry about capitalization!!!
awkward because you went on a frothing tirade in response to my honest question, which you incorrectly interpreted as me favouring immigration restriction (when you do more so than me).
maher would have david duke on if he was wildly popular and influential.
among media personalities, he is uniquely willing to call out bullshit as bullshit. this is an important thing, as a lot of the media establishment seems scared to confront milo (see even the young turks constantly jumping through hoops to avoid…
lol. if you have a valid criticism, let's hear it. it's not on me to run down anything you think *might* help your argument a little bit.
if you're questioning pew research methodology, you're gonna have a bad time.
damn. i bet it is. yikes!
statistics literally can't be bigoted. you can google pew's studies and confirm all of those things in 10 minutes. when i say "more than half," that is a mathematical proportion very different from "each of one and a half billion people with the exact same beliefs," a gross and disingenuous misrepresentation of what i…
you don't have to look further than the numbers (from pew research & others). of the world's 1.6 billion muslims:
thank you for your thoughtful and well-reasoned explanation of why that isn't true. it gives me A LOT to think about!
^is all of this awkward for you if i tell you i support literal open borders?
most oppressive forces in the world power rankings, coming up!
haha