Regarding this:

Read my post again.

I haven't seen any comments that match your description.

Of course, my beef is with a silent trend through the larger social activism community (which i pay close attention to). But I'm just one person, and all I can do is call it out when I see it.

As long as we can agree that the best way to deal with harassment is for the victim to state "No." and the harasser to accept "No." clearly and directly, then I agree with everything you say.

It's okay, and I can definitely sympathize with what you went through.

The cultural problem is obviously the fact that this shit goes on and no one does anything about it.

I think the fact you feel justified in profiling people RE: harassment based exclusively on their race/gender belies another big cultural problem. I know it's beside the point, but I think it warrants a callout.

This is about empowerment and standing up for oneself.
Not about blaming and pitty

Lack of a solid no doesn't equal yes. Correct.

Okay, I read through the whole peace, and I am so ridiculously glad I don't work in the gaming industry.

...and that point is what, exactly?

The only reason why "it's she, not necessarily Mattingly, who is on trial" is because literally no one thinks what Mattingly did was okay. There's no gray area there.

...and you're trying to say what, exactly?

They're not trying to sling crap in the mobile market, they're using it as an advertising source.

They'd likely just have the same multiplatform games as everyone else. And some first party stuff.

Sure, their online stuff could be much better. I usually forget it's even there when it is, because it's trash.

A few things.

Sure, Nintendo lost many customers like you, but they can afford to. They keep their profit margins much higher than MS and Sony do, so each customer Nintendo retains is worth several customers that MS or Sony steal away.

You are very wrong, good sir. I take it you're not particularly learned in business or marketing. Nothing wrong with that.