dronesandgroans
dronesandgroans
dronesandgroans

They have the right to deny someone boarding, but he had already been boarded. That section of the CoC was moot.

No they don’t. Their contract of carriage lists the exclusive reasons for either denying boarding, or refusing transport. Once boarded, the passenger can basically only be removed for safety reasons, not because the airline needs the seats for (presumably non-legging wearing) employees.

So your view of stare decisis is “Yeah, well, that’s just, like, your opinion man.”?

You are combining two (wrong) arguments, that there are limits to the *reason* a federal tax can be imposed and that there are limits to the *amount* of a federal tax that is imposed. Subject the limitations of Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 and the 16th Amendment, Congress can impose a tax of any amount for any

Future RS-25's will be more expendable, but the engine in this test (0528) and on the first few SLS missions will have flown on Shuttle flights before.

The RS-25's are not new, these engines have already flown on multiple Space Shuttle Missions. Although there were three RS-25's on the Shuttle, the Space Launch System will have four of them.

In legal circles, this type of argument is known as “we don’t have anything else so throw the Constitution in there.”

Intentionally entering the property of another without permission is literally the definition of trespassing.

The best part of those shows was how Julia couldn’t hide that she thought Martha was so incredibly pretentious.

Even the most incompetent lawyer in the world would ask for an injunction ordering the “said” page taken down along with damages.

+ huge infusions of VC money + grossley enlarged stock valuation

Cable channels get the overwhelming majority of their revenue through subscriptions; advertising is a tiny drop in the bucket, no channel could survive on it alone.

10x worse? Name a country in Africa or the Middle East where you can’t leave and if you escape your family is thrown into a concentration camp.

All the gear were up; it’s resting on its right because the right engine separated from the wing, and that wing later exploded.

Windshear plus incredibly hot air temperatures (50 degrees celsius) which would only further hurt performance. She probably stalled out just after they got the gear up.

BA once flew a 747 from Los Angeles to England on three engines after one engine failed shortly after takeoff (though the pilot got in some trouble for that).

Wikileaks is just revealing its true self, as a Russian intelligence cut-out. Though I do give them credit for playing Bernie supporters for a song.

Exactly. Wikileaks is starting to look more and more like a Russian intelligence cut-out. It’s not a coincidence that Snowden ended up in Moscow.

Right, I know.

There is legitimate news value in publishing details of a video (possibly recorded with consent) of a celebrity to show that the celebrity has lied and is a racist. There is no news value in publishing the credit card information of political donors, where the identity of those donors is already public.