No, because you see, this is a “special” something that the producer says it’s of equal value to what you are giving them, just like how X company says that 3 sprays and a recolor skin is as equal value to your dollar as any other combination of skins/emotes/whatever else.

Again, if that were the case, you could easily get around gambling regulations by offering a “100% chance of a price!” deal. The fact that you get something, even if it’s shitty, doesn’t make it “not gambling”. Open a casino where all your games have a chance to return a couple of cents to players at the very least on…

So that means that, since having the chance to get something, no matter how worthless it is, means something is not gambling, I can go ahead and open a casino that gambles with plays with “money loot boxes” where you have the chance to either get some pennies or a big payout, but never nothing, that way I can get…

Don’t you think that it’s a bit stupid to argue that since it provides you with something on every “roll” of the dice or loot box opening, it’s not gambling? Don’t you think that every casino on earth could implement a “get a random amount between one penny or whatever you bet when you play” policy to escape gambling…

woman would instantly come under scrutiny in comparison to a man.

Latino here. Please kindly fuck off with your hateful and divisive rhetoric.

You sound very racist.

The skepticism was never born over the gender of “Ellie”. Her early streams showed her being light years from being a top 500 player skill-wise and suddenly it’s a player that is in the top 500 players, does not reveal the main account’s handle even though it’s a very close community, and does not reveal a legal name…

No, there are plenty of other females in Contenders and on the top 500. This was the only contenders player to not publish “her” name, and it turns out to be an impostor confirmed by blizzard, go figure.

Actually, yes, it is hard, considering blizzard just finished “her” background check and found out that it’s actually an impostor, so it would have been hard to say they knew who “she” really was in a tweet defending “her”.

Always nice to see idiots writing articles pretending that the issues with products IN DEVELOPMENT are representative of the end result. Ever heard of a proof of concept?

Wait, what? Don’t you guys get paid monthly? Is this one of those US things?

Oh my god, a game that you have to buy to play! QUICK, SOMEONE CALL THE COPS!

Just saw the live video, I believe it just looks off because of the lightning and trying to place the models in real time.

I’d love to see you try to play any game on a high competitive level for a week straight, the same amount of hours pro players put into their training, and combine that with physical excercise to stay in shape.

Then what is your complaint? They finally made a patrol area that you isn’t automatically outleveled by just completing the campaign. Hell, at 524 there are only a couple of enemies that have thes skull icon, most have a sword icon which means they only slightly outlevel you. You probably “used up” your first week’s…

You are 324 and can’t raise LL? I’m calling absolute bullshit. You don’t need prime engrams to level from 324 all the way up to 500. Literally every reward in the new campaign, every strike in the playlist, every vendor, the crucible, gambit, every legendary engram from bounties, everything gives you rewards up to the…

Business =/= work, as dumb as that might sound. Who pays their bills makes a big difference, it means they needed another kind of visa, not just the waiver, since WOTC is a US company.

No problem, I also don’t care about people who take the first narrative they come across and interiorize it.

Everyone has a right to have their own opinion. Pretending their employer’s opinion is somehow comparable to people that don’t even work in the company are equivalent, is wrong. They decided they didn’t want a time bomb within their company judging from how she reacted to a pretty simple critique, and they went ahead…