Its a nice car but 96K is too much, especially for a car with sporting intentions that lacks a manual gearbox option.

He’s sloppy, misses key points of information, and sometimes just gets stuff outright wrong. For some random shmuck at a party that might not be a big deal but he’s making these videos under the pretense of educating and informing people.

But Engineering Explained says so!!! Jalop must make article about it without doing any of their own research. 

This. I am genuinely puzzled why people are confused. My truck gets 18mpg highway. Putting a modest amount of weight (say 5k combined) on the trailer brings it to 10mpg if I’m being conservative. I haven’t towed its max capacity, but have to imagine that it would drop much further. My neighbor (with an F350) says his…

I’m not a fan of EE because he misses some details and gets them wrong. Being an expert in a field he talks about is frustrating because he gets some of the details wrong.  And most of his content is regurgitating information that is already out there.  Some of his personal experiments are kind of neat. 

....and my point is that fraction of the distance is enough for most people

Electric vehicles are GREAT for towing. All that torque at zero RPM means they can move out with authority.

That’s not how you make the monies.  Take somebody’s content, then write a blog post about said content, then embed their content in your content, clicks within clicks, interlinked.

Anyone else tired discussing Nissan? 

“Is here to give us the details” aka today’s issue of “We Found a Youtube Video to Summarize and Pretend We’re Associated With”...

I can think of another electric vehicle enhanced by a reliable and known technology that can tow literally thousand of tons for miles:

What Nissan needs to do:

Fact is the vast majority of regular people towing isn’t huge loads and it isn’t for long distances. Small car trailers, motorcycle trailers, load to the dump, etc. Will it take a trailer cross country taking your kid to college? Nah, will it let the average person do what they need around their local area? Yep. 

They didn’t forget, they just outsourced that technical content to shitty Engineering Explained videos.

The CVT is what I think of when I think of Nissan.

LOL, Pathfinder old?  It’s only been out for like thre... seven years!?!  Holy shit.

Focus should be put on the Pathfinder first. It’s super old and ugly, but that’s the most profitable category. There’s value attached to that name, and it can double as a good base for a true luxury offering for Infiniti if done right.

Neutral: If I were the head of Nissan, I think I’d start by making underpowered, uninspired cars with a CVT. Then focus on fleet sales to prop up volume. Rather than update the Z to bring it into this millennium, I’d keep milking that for several more years.

He says that now. Then BMW will offer 26-inch wheels and Audi will just HAVE to go bigger.

I hate that i clicked into this gossip post