drbigbeef
drbigbeef
drbigbeef

Are you really that dim?

That’s not correct, but nice try.

This is wildly untrue.  Please stop spreading lies.

This is only the tip of the iceberg.

Fuck off. And die.

Do you want me to write a book length response here? Because there have literally been books written about it. This is not a case that can be captured in 140 characters, which means most people won’t take the time to understand it.

If you want to ask a specific question about what you think Gladwell has wrong, I’d be happy to answer it for you.  Asking a non-specific question, will get you a non-specific answer.

Nope.

In another interview, Gladwell says that he isn’t sure if Sandusky is guilty.  If that were to be the case, that would certainly explain a lot about the non-action by Paterno and PSU admins.

There is “new” evidence that Gladwell has reviewed that most people have not (because everyone, like yourself, refuses to admit they might have been wrong).  By considering this evidence, he’s reached a conclusion that is different than his original thoughts on the matter.  Kudos to him for being brave enough to

This statement is wildly incorrect.  Please stop perpetuating this nonsense.

This particular expression of his opinion was not his best. But he is correct. He is also correct that the Penn State administrators did nothing wrong. He was quoted on another podcast as saying “I am ashamed to be part of a society which tried to put Graham Spanier in prison.”  If you know the facts of the case (most

Parts of Maryland (e.g. outside of DC) also have weird laws.  No beer/wine in grocery stores.  

I get that everyone has individual beer tastes (e.g. I do not care for IPAs) but I think Rubaeus is a well made beer.  Do you not like that style (fruit ales)?  To be fair, it’s better on tap than bottled and best on nitro.

You seem worked up that I’m worked up. Slow day at Taco Bell?

I’m just perplexed when people insist on creating controversy (especially racial controversy) where there is none.  We have enough problems (including serious racial issues) to deal with at the moment without inventing new bullshit problems that don’t actually exist.

I think that eyes are round and O shaped.  Similar example: the Hooter’s logo uses an owl’s eyes for the double “O”.  No one says “holy crap” something is hiding behind those eyes. Just let it go. This is a non-issue.

How are the eyes covering up two letters? The eyes are two letters (two “o’s”)  There is nothing from the context of the shirt to suggest there are letters behind the eyes.  Ridiculous. 

Can you articulate why you think is bad? I’m trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here, but so far I’ve got:

My takeaway from this piece: you hate privately funded museums and libraries. Cool.