Maybe. But it also might be because he’s not funny.

Right there with you. Been a Knicks fan since the Trent Tucker days and I can’t think of a single instance when Carmelo Anthony has made me say “wow.” No heroic buzzer-beater, no pass that takes your breath away, no amazing dunk. What does a career highlight reel of ‘Melo even look like?

Albert’s smart enough, the problem is he thinks he’s reeeeeeeally smart.

“Socially liberally but fiscally conservative” is kind of bullshit.

Albert may be a liberal, but he and Trump are very similar. Strong opinions about everything. Opinions not always well-founded. Love the sounds of their own voices. Thin-skinned. Bully tendencies.

I came here to pose the same question, because I just don’t get it.

Either that or running a corporation!

This kid is fucked.

RI’d like them to work side-by-side so we can watch KG hector SAS to tears every night.

I did see the press conference. And besides his threat against Paul Ryan, to me and most of the pundits, the word that came to mind was conciliatory.

‘Melo is a career .453 and Wilkins is .461. Essentially the same.

I know you’re joking, but the best analogue for Carmelo Anthony is Dominique Wilkins and it’s kind of uncanny.

Haha. Nice one.

You’re like bizarro Trump!

You think Reilly’s boring and unfunny, I think Toucher’s boring and unfunny, and given that I’m the only person to acknowledge your comment in any way, it seems everybody else thinks your comment was boring and unfunny.

Hey, we’re all flawed, but it’s possible to be both “a flawed human being” and “a fucking asshole.”

You too. Your contribution about Toucher and Rich was outstanding.

Now, you’re getting it! You’re disagreeing with my my assertion, which is fine. You don’t believe that a Trump pivot will earn him more supporters. Okay. Agree to disagree.

First you intentionally misrepresented my position, and now you’re entirely ignoring the most important part of it.

Trump’s an idiot, but he’s not a dummy.