Chrysler has been in more laps than a napkin.

I read the whole article and I appreciate the technical knowledge of classic graphics production in the PS2 era and earlier. The Quake 3 Comparison is a good one to make, since id is known for making the best graphics in the world, with the fewest resources needed.

Did you just seriously compare The Starry Night to shitty, blurry PS2 visuals.......?

This article is a bit of rubbish isn’t it?
FF12 lost none of its feel with the remaster. The game looks better, the art style is the same. If anything it show us what Square managed to do with the PS2 at the end of its cycle, the game looked great, and how with a coat of fresh paint looks and feels even better.
Then…

File this under “People will bitch about literally ANYTHING.”

“The gameplay remains untouched” The fact that the writer wrote that means he doesn’t know enough about the game to be qualified to write a post about it. Typical kotaku writers though.

People who prefer the PS2's “quality” visuals are the same people who think VHS offers an experience you can’t get with Blu-ray and that the distortion and low fidelity fuzzing sounds on ancient LP’s are better than than crystal clear audio where you can hear all the instruments.