Yes. And the other headsets that use lighthouse tracking are the Index and the Vive (and not even the new Vive Cosmos). Anything else, such as this, you would need to buy the controllers, buy lighthouses, and then fiddle with things so that the game uses the non-lighthouse headset for video, but then uses the…

IN. THE. SPEC. SHEET. 

The kit is $599, the kit includes the headset, cable, and two controllers. I don’t know what more you want. 

This is exactly what VR needs. It’s a shame that the knuckles controllers form are still essentially Vive only (yes, I know that there are ways to kitbash them with other headsets), but $600 for convenient transportation, EXCELLENT optics and solid tracking? Yes please. The Rift S is $200 cheaper, but made some pretty…

Yes. If you click through and look at the spec sheet, the kit includes the controllers.

Absolutely agreed. That being said, The New Colossus really redeemed itself a lot by making the first half (third?) of the game an extended meditation on life, death, and masculinity. It doesn’t end as strong, but it is still a wonderful game.

From Margaret Atwood’s “Happy Endings”

That’s fair enough, but a lot of the cheapness of the new XCOM game was due to it’s obvious budget looks and shrunken scope. I think it was more interesting than the base XCOM 2 game, and so even though the Gears/Chimera comparison isn’t exact, Gears is worth mentioning as the better game. It’s also a great step. It’s…

Gears 5 is great and Gears Tactics even better. Honestly, Gears Tactics is better than the new XCOM game, which is a pretty big deal.

I know it isn’t as cheap as the buds listed here, but you can get factory refurbished Jabra Elite 65t for $70. They are excellent earbuds that have a great battery life, are comfortable as hell, and sound MUCH better than anything else here. That $180 earbuds that not that long ago were pretty much the gold standard…

I know it isn’t as cheap as the buds listed here, but you can get factory refurbished Jabra Elite 65t for $70. They…

It’s REALLY worth noting that this doesn’t even really get at the problem. The problem is that the game has always been a 100 person drop game. 100 people drop, and the best person wins. The maps are big, and matches can be intense. Sometimes there are lulls, and sometimes a lot of hotspots. Now, in order to not play…

This is how the game has been since it literally started. It is a tough game, but there isn’t a huge advantage to more experienced players. They will obviously be better, as with everything, but it isn’t like unskilled players have no chance. And it’s a relatively quick learning curve.

What are you even talking about? UE tech demos are not in any way a preview of the kinds of games that developers will make. Did we see a lot of Epic hallways running with flowing lava and lorded over by giant demons this generation? We did not, even though that was the UE4 tech demo.

The person I wrote it to responded. And in the end, I care about the value of criticism and wrote about that. Apparently what is important to you is...calling me an asshole. It’s apparently VERY important to you. Have a nice evening.

Please try to practice just a smidgen of reading comprehension. I said it doesn’t matter who reads it, not that I hoped nobody read it. The person I was addressing read it, and got pissy about it. Amusingly, you, some random person, has also read it, and have also gotten pissy about it. Not sure why, but there you go. …

I’m writing in the comments section of a gaming website, it doesn’t matter who reads it. Being a dick is sometimes cathartic. I can’t condescend to my students like this (though, thankfully, they generally don’t say things that are as vacuous with a tone of superiority), and so I point out the worthlessness of…

Oh god, you’re one of those. I’m sowwy if youw feewings got hoight.

While your response is messy (I honestly cannot tell what your point is RE adaptations), your first point is correct. I should have more carefully used my phrasing. In my first example, I am really talking about a discussion of craft (this is working/not-working for x/y reasons), and while the original commenter was…

It is worth noting that you are referring to a completely different kind of criticism. You are engaging in direct feedback with the author/creator (or as the author/creator), and the point of this criticism is, ostensibly, for the author to improve the work through this feedback. This is a useful artistic endeavor. It…

Not really. Look at a let’s play of it: