dr_watson
Dr_Watson
dr_watson

Yea... where’s Park?

I’d like to echo the QA complaint. Levis of today just ARE NOT the Levi’s of 20 years ago. Yeah, I know, everybody gets tired of the old man saying that… but… it is simply true. From sizing, to fabric durability, the Levi’s I’ve gotten in the past few years just are junk comparatively. And know how I know? Because I

I’d like to echo the QA complaint. Levis of today just ARE NOT the Levi’s of 20 years ago. Yeah, I know, everybody

No, there’s really no other reason. You just have to remember that the younger kids were raised a little softer than most. Thus, they feel the need to be fashionable.

Fashionable to me is a good suit with sharp shoes and a kicking tie. Jeans are comfort wear that shouldn’t be passes off as fashion IMHO.

No, there’s really no other reason. You just have to remember that the younger kids were raised a little softer than

This is kind of a pointless exercise if 80% of the jeans listed are various fits of Levi’s. It would be far more constructive to recommend five different brands of jeans and leave the individual style up to the readers. Now that four of the five options are from the same company this is really just asking people which

This is kind of a pointless exercise if 80% of the jeans listed are various fits of Levi’s. It would be far more

Keep engineering cars to combat stupid, you’re just engineering the next level of stupid.

Crossovers are little more than tall cars with over-sized wheels. They are not meant to be practical, only to raise American’s butts further off the ground in traffic. That’s it.

I wouldn’t limit to age, but more powerful, sportier car should require a special driving license. It doesn’t make sense that the same license that is valid to a Toyota Yaris is valid to a Ferrari 488 or a Porsche Turbo S.

Just like spotify, netflix, and steam style services have absolutely decimated piracy numbers, the most effective way to combat piracy is to remove the incentive to pirate works. If you make it absolutely seamlessly easy to just pay a nominal amount of money for something, it actually works...

Dear Shitty Steamers: We’re not giving you shit because the jokes were risqué and our fee-fees were hurt, we’re giving you shit because THE JOKES AREN’T FUCKING FUNNY.

Competition on emerging platforms usually hurt things if there is no foothold. The rift provides no competition since they’re keen on platform segmentation and are now owned by a true consumer nightmare of a company. Fuck them. They did their job and got a viable company with viable software experience, better

The problem with such a league is once a formula was found that worked everyone would just converge on it anyway, and it would turn into an ever-increasing arms-race of more and more expensive cars that would eventually cost out anyone trying to compete.

I would not put it past them. Gordon Murray once did something similar back in his F1 (not that F1) days:

I’m with you, but having been through four startups myself (two that were acquired), I want to caution that a $740 million offer is not remotely the same thing as a done $740 million deal. Due diligence would likely have revealed Pebble’s various problems and dropped that pricetag significantly. Still, hard to believe

I’m new to logic but isn’t this kind of maybe sorta exactly the same thing he gave shit to Clinton about with that whole email scandal?

Insurance should not pay out claims for un-belted occupants. Problem solved.

I would actually be OK with this. Put them into the impaired fatalities category along with drunk drivers and drug users.

You seem to have a misunderstanding as to what this ruling actually means

Thankfully we have the Trump Nuclear Winter plan to combat the rising global temperatures.

So a dude with more money than most people see in their lives chose to take advantage of economically-disadvantaged individuals for the sake of some anti-Semitic “humor,” and is now surprised that there are consequences that go with that kind of behavior.

Got it.

Having read some of the comments on the previous article