Pirates were also involved in the only rainout in a domed stadium.

Dont want to be ‘that guy’, but the Reds-Astros game you linked to did not featured a Griffey HR. Had two hits and an RBI.

Wait till you guys see how the cardinals game ended...

Unless you believe it’s consensual, in which case it’s a gang bang, not a gang rape. A gang rape is a horrible act that violates the woman involved. A consensual gang bang is a loving act involving role play and trust.

If he has other victims it could help them against him. He could still. Face a wrongful death suit if not a civil suit for the rape from her family.

Sure you will. Just watch it on a streaming site (unless media piracy is something you are strongly against). Then you get to see it and they don’t get your ticket money. Use an add blocker to avoid annoying pop ups and given revenue to the site.

Legally though, I don’t think it makes sense for him to basically admit guilt when he testified in a court of law that he was innocent. Couldn’t he lose a civil case with apologizing for that? I think he seems like a shitty dude, but I don’t think anyone would apologize for something they were legally found innocent…

And you’re cheating at pretending to have a viewpoint worth considering.

the most beautiful soccer played in england this year? you haven’t seen city or arsenal this season?

It’s hilarious watching American writers trying their best to use British conjugation, only to fail miserably as the article progresses

Have you guys learned nothing from past declarations made this early in the season? Literally anything could happen between now and the end of the campaign. Just one injury to, say, Coutinho and Liverpool could falter immensely.

I was going to seriously ask if the additional scenes fixed a two-dimensional “villain” with no motivation or meaningful connection to the heroes, but the article actually answered that question: No.

It makes Melissa McCarthy funny?

“Yes it’s true. This movie has no dick”.

“The bad guy in Ghostbusters is Rowan North (Neil Casey), who wants to bring ghosts into the world because he was bullied.”

No, the biggest plothole remains..WHY did they make this in the first place? And why, if they were so dead set about making it, did they NOT find anyone that was actually funny? And let us not forget, they ripped off the originals.

i watched this movie last night! it was just crap all the way through. felt like they made a movie out of an SNL sketch. mainly, i thought the writing was what let the movie down.

TL;DR - Nobody except you former Gawker clowns give two shits about this pathetic movie.

Does it explain how an adult human being doesn’t know how a telephone works?

How does it feel to pretend to like yet another garbage reboot souless studio cash grab for the lone reason that you fell for a corporate manufactured sexism/racism crisis?