doubtful
doubtful
doubtful

I disagree. Touchscreens, gyroscopes, etc. can all influence the way the game is controlled. An optical illusion on a 2D plane designed to create the appearance of depth that can be turned off 100% for every game without effecting gameplay is a gimmick.

Battery drains you!

Unlike the features Nintendo offered that were labeled as 'gimmicks' in the past, such as dual screens, the Wiimote, etc., the "3D" effect is the first I think truly lives up to the label.

Here is a list of things the movie will have in common with its source material:

Many times obesity in animals and people is cause by *not* spending enough money on food. Cheap food is full of fat and fillers.

There's a Better Than Ezra lyric from the song "Under You" that captures that sentiment:

Rent and property costs vary dramatically around the world.

Is there anywhere in the world that corporations don't get to use the public police as their own private enforcement group? The most disturbing part of this whole thing is that a representative of Sony accompanied the police. Would that happen for any average joe?

There really isn't a vehicle for making an "endrun around consumer choice," unless you don't want to sell products. They are flooding the market with 3D movies and televisions now because it is currently popular and is a way to prop up the decreasingly profitable theater and television manufacturing industry. Once the

Nintendo is too late, in my opinion, as I believe the overall tide is turning against 3D. I would honestly be interested to know the actually number of people who use the 3D feature beyond the first few minutes of gaming.

It's a fad. Fads can come and go, like bell bottoms. 3D has come and gone in the movie theater several times; this time will not be different. Television manufacturers will try to squeeze as many dollars as they can out of people for the feature, and then it will go away. It has also been done in video games before

Skip the cursing and just drop them from your list. They're ruining the spirit of the game by essentially cheating for unlocks or achievement points. They should be banned from gaming.

"Sometime after 2008, Nintendo..."

I was so very disappointed when they said that Watson was being fed the clue via text file and wasn't seeing and hear the clue like the humans. Once I heard that and then saw the answers being displayed on screen, I quit watching. All the hype, and it was a boring, dishonest disappointment. Boo Jeopardy, boo IBM.

I don't see any valid reason why they shouldn't cover them. The iOS platform has attracted legions of gamers, indie developers and big name developers. Both Nintendo and Sony view them threatening competition. Most importantly they are video games.

It $eem$ like $omething alway$ convince$ $tudio$ to change their mind.

Stockholders.

How awful it must feel as a child to hear your mother lie and blame you for your sibling's injuries. What a pathetic excuse for a mother. This certainly couldn't have been the first sign or instance of physical abuse as well. She should be in jail, too.

While I was watching the trailer, it reminded me of World War Z. Something about the way it was pieced together was reminiscent of the storytelling Brooks used, and it definitely had a strong human element to it. Damn good book for anyone who hasn't read it.

I think we've reached the apex of absurdity: when confronted with a valid argument about how piracy affects the market (and thus how it's not 'just harmless copying'), the response is to actually accuse the person who is arguing against not taking what you haven't paid for of entitlement.