I’m horrified.

And Nate Silver was lambasted for giving Trump a 33% chance of winning! Put on an oven mitt before handling this taek: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nate-silver-election-forecast_us_581e1c33e4b0d9ce6fbc6f7f

Silver constantly warned that this election was different given the volatility in the polls and the large amount of undecided voters. He also warned that there was a significant possibility that Trump would win the Electoral College, but would lose the popular vote. Nate Cohn at the Upshot, however, was completely…

Nate Silver’s model was the only one which gave Trump a good chance of winning. Take it up with the Huffington Post and Sam Wang; they gave Clinton close to a 99% chance of winning....

Also, it’s a useful thing that Democrats need to hear. Big ad buys don’t win elections, but direct voter outreach does.

“I won Iowa not because the demographics dictated that I would win Iowa. It’s because I spent 87 days going” door to door, visiting diners, shaking hands and kissing babies.”

“We have to compete everywhere. we have to show up everywhere. we have to work at a grassroots level,” he continued. “I won Iowa not because the demographics dictated that I would win Iowa. It’s because I spent 87 days going” door to door, visiting diners, shaking hands and kissing babies.

You’re disowning your inlaws and denying them time with their own grandchild because of how they voted in a Presidential election? Really???

In my experience with this site, when you say “troll” you mean anyone who has a opinion on this that is different from your own. Even if they are being civil, respectful and calm. People lie from time to time, for various reasons. Men can lie, women can lie, Christians can lie and Muslims can lie too. There are many…

Honestly in this case I find your headline just as misleading as the ones you’re complaining about.

Other media outlets have reported that she confessed to the polices that she fabricated the story. They suspected as much with her inconsistent statements regarding the claimed assault. As such, she is now being charged for filing that false report. It sounds like she just wanted attention; she got it.

taking whatever skepticism you want from this, some news reports state the police say she admitted to fabricating the story.

I’m glad she’s going to face some consequences for doing something this shitty. She’s made it harder for women who’ve actually been harassed like this to be believed—as though I didn’t worry enough already about hijab-wearing women in my family being targeted by Trumpites.

While I can’t even pretend to know the truth in this case, neither can anyone else who isn’t directly associated with the case. Therefore, I find the title of this article misleading and biased and the article full of logical fallacies like post hoc ergo propter hoc assuming that because Trump was elected that people…

This is absolute madness!

Prioritizing Hillary Clinton’s feelings over the people who will die as a result of this election is how we got into this mess in the first place.

Yesterday, a DNC meeting held by Brazile apparently became so contentious that a staffer only identified as “Zach” was reportedly booed as he openly questioned whether anyone at the top of the organization should be trusted going forward.

She was looking for a front page to frame and hang on the wall, and this was the most positive one she found?

I totally agree. This sets a bad precedent. We lost and must learn from the mistakes we made this time around.

This is a huge thing on the internet right now but it’s such a bad idea. The Electoral College making Clinton president will surely cause a HUGE upheaval. We’re seeing the protests now but the protests from the right would be insane.