Excuse me for barging into your debate, but THIS:

—
The Ex-UMass student's claims are just that: claims. There is no proof to back up anything he is saying; he's just making accusations against the school after being found responsible for rape.

Actually, drunk people cannot legally consent to having sex.

You do recognize that neither the colleges nor the police have great statistics for handling sexual assault cases in general right? What does it matter who is handling it when both actively try not to?

By the way, I don't know who you stupidly think you're lumping me in with when making your ridiculous assertion that "It's only accused rapists you all have a vested interest in protecting, even though all studies done on the subject prove that false allegations are exceedingly rare" but you should learn to discuss…

First off, the only one "bitching" is you. I'm discussing the issue.

Nothing wrong with that except for the fact that this means victims will have to continue living on campus and attending classes with their rapists. Nothing wrong with that except for the fact that colleges wouldn't be able to take actions against students that violate their codes of conduct and therefore expel a…

"that the criminal justice system resolve cases before universities look into them or hand down punishments."

Okay. I mean, I disagree but I also think, relative to your value in creating profits in Dentonworld, you're likely underpaid. It's not the work and it's "ease", it's the profit it creates that I go by. But I won't argue you with you, it's your opinion.