doostin-scooter
Doostin Scooter
doostin-scooter

Schumer and Pelosi weren’t really THAT bad. I agree with the earlier consensus that they weren’t the best choice for messengers, but they really didn’t say anything stupid. And Schumer isn’t wrong that Dems have had a hand in beefing up border security. I have feelings about that but I don’t think it was so much a

This is Splinter. They don’t even have to say her name to imply they want AOC to do it. 

. . . Why on Earth-1 would it NOT be the speaker of the house and the Senate minority leader? If they did not do their response they would be criticized for that as well.

“...will not come from any of the other available, less decrepit and actually invigorating Democratic leaders, but instead two white people that are a combined 146 years old”

His later unconfirmed statement:

Reporter asks Sarah Huckabee Sanders about potential plans to pay for the border wall: “Have you done the math on that?”

“...but what should we do when the highborn and wealthy take to crime? Indeed, if a poor man will spend a year in prison for stealing out of hunger, how high would the gallows need to be to hang the rich man who breaks the law out of greed?”

All caps, but no snaps.

You have failed.

I believe this is the gif you’re looking for

Came here to say that.  The insinuation that a black woman can’t be racist and/or xenophobic and/or out of touch is incredibly bizarre.  

You clearly missed the point of my post. Barack Obama was once against gay marriage. Does that mean he wasn’t a decent person then? Hillary Clinton supported the Iraq war. Was she not a decent person? John Kennedy used the Mafia to help get himself elected. Everyone, even liberals, support and do terrible things

This is completely about performative “wokeness.”

“And the in-game days go by!”

why taking a jury trial instead of a plea deal would be a Bad Idea, and why doing so would result in harsher punishment.

I think they should all boycott the briefings.

Yeah, this is a weak attempt at outrage. She gave a meaningless non-answer to a journalist she didn’t give a damn about.

In the hoc-key justice system, the players are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the referees, who investigate on-ice crime; and the Department of Player Safety, which haphazardly prosecutes the offenders. These are their stories.

it reminds me of the old stupid Cheech & Chong joke “I was all messed up on drugs, now I’m all messed up on the Lord.” Now the evangelicals are all messed up on Trump, but the speed with which Trump usurped their religious morals is still surreal to me. Watching “Christians” rush to aggressively defend the least godly

“embracing and encouraging the destructive nationalism we’re supposed to never forget”

“There are reasons why it’s there and those reasons are important,”

Do I really need to translate this into 2018 Game Dev Speak, or are we all clear and it’s as obvious as possible why there is a limit?