doomsdaymelody
DoomsdayMelody
doomsdaymelody

Ford launching the edge sport as an “ST” model may very well prevent me from being a future customer. It’s like you said they built near perfect hatchbacks and then said never mind. They want me to buy a mustang next (until that gets replaced by the mustang inspired electric crossover) but that car is an extra

I’m willing to bet on skinny ties. Wont stop me from wearing them to get those sweet sweet future retro photos.

The base model costs almost $40k? CP.

FCA doesn’t need a partner. FCA just needs to die. Yes, the hellcat is magnificent. Aside from that feat of engineering, they sell archaic garbage that isn’t necessarily reliable. When Toyota sells something for a decade without changing it, it’s because it’s bulletproof. When FCA sells something for 10 years,

A ten year old BMW without an “M” on it for more than 10k? CP all day.

Yep, it’ll be hard to replace if the time comes. Maybe a veloster turbo-rspec? I dunno if anything will match my baby

The piston rings, which were the source of the oil consumption,were likely covered in the recall that Hyundai issued considering the mileage the vehicle covered. Considering the vehicle is only a hair over double the powertrain warranty, I’d treat this like buying a Lexus with 140k on the odometer. It just finished

Is this sarcasm?

NP, you can fix 90% of the flaws with this car with $100 and an afternoon at your local u-pullit yard.

A massive investment? Dodge has been using an antiquated chassis and platform, from a 2008 Mercedes E-Class. I get it, they’re essentially printing money with all of their R&D going into high performance engines, but to say that they would need a massive investment is... a bit grandeous. They could just work on using

Coupe”

Coupe”

True, there’s a saying:

Why has NPOCP devolved into “how much will you pay for someone else’s mostly finished product car? Is it as much as it would cost to buy an almost brand new car?”

Increased fuel economy?

Power figures are all within spitting distance of each other. Keep in mind any of the manufacturers could make alterations to the tune the engine runs to make up numbers. Realistically, I’d be more interested in seeing each of the dyno charts laid on top of one another, see who makes peak torque first, who holds it

186 horsepower is actually going to feel pretty stout in a car that only weighs 3000 lbs. Now, I’m not saying it’s going to feel fast, but it’s certainly not going to feel anemic. 

So let’s get this straight, you insist that that sounds like a strategy that Mazda would use, because about two decades ago, when they were owned by Ford, they sold a rebadged ranger in their lineup? Additionally, in spite of the fact that Mazda has built its own truck, and sold it in other markets since then, and is

Due to the fact that SUVs are generally the same sedan chassis on stilts doesn’t that put them at a higher rollover risk compared to the sedans they are based on though? I absolutely don’t think that trucks are or were safer than cars, I was just making a sarcastic comment about how stupid people are when they

Sounds like mazda? The car company that is a fraction of the size of Toyota that actually develops and builds all of its cars in house (including a sports car)? The car company that Toyota buys the Toyota Yaris iA from? That mazda? Let’s take a count; number of cars that mazda buys from other automakers and slaps