Can’t stop laughing at the idea of an eight-foot tie.

Jesus Christ. DACA is not a law. It’s a policy. A law is enacted by congress. DACA can be revoked at any time. Deferred action has existed for decades. You may want to educate yourself on basic civics and the facts of DACA before you tell me what you’re warrioring for on social media. Further, the very nature of DACA…

Grow up. My facts are “discouraging”? What are you, 14? There’s no such thing as “ethical standing”. I’m a lawyer, I work with asylum seekers, I don’t go to court with “do the right thing”, I go to court with paperwork and facts and cogent arguments. Do me a favor, don’t warn me. You sound like a child.

Did they? Chanel did something very similar 30 years ago, Balenciaga did it three years ago. This is a tough one. I hope the exposure gets her recognition and sales, which YSL doesn’t need and she deserves.

Why not make it simple? If you’re too drunk to drive, you’re assumed too drunk to legally consent to sex? Or, if your BAC is more than twice a legal limit, you are considered incapacitated? OR, let’s assume she was very into it while drunk and conscious but the moment you pass out, you’d think that consent is now…

I didn’t patronize the commenter, I pointed out the legal reality that she faces. If you read all my comments, you see that I mentioned repeatedly that we have to fight to change the law because DACA is bullshit. It’s not counterproductive to make sure that people know and understand the law as it stands NOW, because…

A doctor would do something medically inadvisable and ethically awful? I’m sincerely hoping that nobody in actual healthcare is this cruel.

I thought “President Donald J. Trump” was one of the worst thing I could ever hear but “everlasting UTIs” looks like the new winner.

What kind of licensed medical doctor would deliberately keep medical information from a patient? It seems highly unethical. A developing fetus who is an at-risk pregnancy can still be carried to term, but would require the mother to follow a different care plan, birth plan... How could you not tell her? What if her…

But that’s the crux of DACA, it’s literally at the discretion of immigration officials, as long as the order is in place. It’s the language of the exemption, basically “as long as we say it’s ok, you’re a low priority focus for deportation, but as soon as we say it’s not ok, you’re no longer ok.” I’m not angry at…

This IS her home, this IS unfair, and deporting her serves no purpose, but “it’s just so mean” is not a legal defense here. If I were her lawyer, I’d go for due process or some action based on her parents giving up her rights for her, but even there... By letting her DACA status lapse, it’s hard to ask the courts to…

Dismissing my comment doesn’t make you any less wrong. This is from USCIS:

OMFG no. No. Just... no. Her status was expired. She has no DACA status right now, she applied three months after it expired, and is/was hoping for USCIS to grant her a renewal. There is no guarantee she would have received it because she let it lapse.

Her DACA status isn’t pending. It is expired. It expired in November. She filed the paperwork to try and renew in February because she couldn’t afford the reapplication fee and I assume didn’t qualify for or didn’t apply for a fee waiver. This is awful, it’s inhumane, it serves no purpose, but legally, she has no…

They’re not. Her DACA status expired. Instead of being pissed off at ICE agents, we should be voting for senators and presidents who will put forth actual immigration reform that grants kids who were brought here a true path to citizenship, not a turning of a blind eye to their real plight. DACA is a stay of execution…

Furthermore, ICE’s leeway in whom they go after and when is the very thing that makes DACA possible. DACA asks for low-priority enforcement. It’s much like low-priority laws surrounding small quantities of weed, relying on law enforcement judgment and discretion to make sure we arrest bad people, but not a kid with a…

From the article above: “Among DACA recipients—which is a path to citizenship for people whose parents brought them to the US as children—Vargas is not the first to be targeted....”

It’s an extremely important detail because kids granted relief under DACA are sometimes under the mistaken impression that it’s a path to citizenship and “legitimacy” in the eyes of the American legal system. It’s not. DACA is a shitty bandaid, which is more than a kick in the pants, but it’s not what these kids…

Barron should be eligible in seven years, what a great opportunity to give back to our country.

As long as going to fuck myself is MY choice, right?