I should explicitly mention the parallels of a masked vigilante group expending mob justice on their perceived enemies outside of the law and the KKK.
Don K
doncae
I think you missed the part where she/masked vigilantes/the (very racially integrated) police are not necessarily better morally than white supremacists.
Two paragraphs, two sentences.
Hydrogen?
I’m betting Blizzard will be okay (relative to this event).
It’s a skin color.
Right, but things are interpreted differently depending on context.
“The pro Hearthstone community has tough decisions to make because other people made a political gesture and has put pressure on their revenue stream. What a complicated situation!”
Half of Blizzard’s revenue comes from China. And China absolutely has the power, and willingness, to just cut off that revenue stream as punishment.
Real easy to stand up to China and denounce Blizzard when half of your revenue doesn’t come from there, eh?
“Damon Young, we’re withholding your paycheck. It’d be nice to have paychecks, wouldn’t it?
You sound like you’re having a good morning.
I’m sure the alternative ”Blizzard support for Hearthstone eSport ends months after losing access to Chinese revenue” surely would’ve showed China!
One day we'll return to a world where evidence is preferred.
I think you’re just trying to defend Obama here, but I’m not attacking him. I think you’re forgetting that this post is in relation to a Nobel Peace Prize.
Like most other people complaining about my response, you’re comparing Obama to Trump. Yes, Trump is sending just as many or more drone strikes as Obama. But he comes AFTER Obama. And that’s a weird comparison to make.
No he didn’t.
You’re comparing Obama to Trump. You’re listing differences between Obama and a Trump. Obama did not follow Trump.
No argument there. Those are difficult decisions to be made and I personally do not ding him for increased drone use.