Nope, Lisa is in trouble for pretending that she wasn’t trying to out Dorit on shit she actually did. If she’d only just outed Dorit on shit, she wouldn’t be in the hot seat at all.
Nope, Lisa is in trouble for pretending that she wasn’t trying to out Dorit on shit she actually did. If she’d only just outed Dorit on shit, she wouldn’t be in the hot seat at all.
Eh, if Lisa had actually come at this directly, Dorit probably would be the one getting pounded. Instead, LVP did this passive aggressive manipulation gambit one too many times, and they’ve decided they’re all sick of it, so in their minds, it’s the bigger sin.
Because Lisa is garbage at naming things. Like, why isn’t it Vanderpups? That’s just a gimme.
Oh, anytime ENM comes up with my coworkers, I’ve found there’s a 50-50 chance of them believing it’s the product of nymphomania or some otherwise damaged soul. Over after-work drinks I was recently asked, “Who hurt you? Why don’t you think you’re good enough for a real relationship?”
Yeah, but the problem is not that LVP engineers storylines. It’s that she engineers storylines where her hands are kept clean while someone else is cast as the villain. If Lisa had just come at Dorit direct instead of enlisting her employee and Teddi into this scheme, it would be about the puppy.
Am I the only one who gets that Puppygate is not about the puppy? It’s a gross oversimplification, like saying that Watergate was about a hotel break-in. But like Watergate, it’s the not crime that’s the issue here. It’s the cover up. Puppygate is about LVP being a scheming, Regina George-esque puppermaster for…
I was too young to follow the scandal at that time, but did people REALLY not find any fault with his credibility in this interview?
I mean, simple solution was just a turn of phrase, but if you guys really want to parse it, yeah Harvey’s pretty vanilla. I was honestly just trying to be excited at the prospect of representation on a show that’s both likely to and capable of portraying it without stigma.
It’s not simple for anyone involved really. But from an ENM perspective, it seems simpler than stringing two people along forever.
It’s not simple for anyone involved really. But from an ENM perspective, it seems simpler than tired trope of stringing two people along forever.
When her warlock beau proposed that he was comfortable sharing and also helped watch over Harvey in a crucial situation, I really hoped they were laying the groundwork for a healthy depiction of a poly vee. This show has been pretty progressive on a lot of other subjects and characterizations, so it’d be nice to them…
I practice nonmonogamy, so love triangles always have me screaming, “There’s a very simple solution here! You don’t have to pick one!”
Short answer: it depends on the type of leather. The process for the kinds used for saddles or dog chew toys is different than the kind used for luxury goods. The latter category is more compatible with meat production. Bottom line is that leather production extends far enough beyond the meat industry to discredit the …
Leather may have used to be a byproduct of meat production once upon a time but not anymore. I asked this question of my fashion textiles professor, and the gist was that meat cows are fattened while leather cows are reared to be sinewy. The meat from leather cows would be tough and only good for jerky, not tender…
She and Clay are BFF. She delivered at 50 which is goddamn impressive, even with IVF.
He’s lived here 40 years. His kids are American. People adapt.
What? No, Foster’s sister had a kid with Aiken.
Americans just call it “college” as a blanket term, so it’s not odd at all.
Oh, honey.