Read about the cases at Amherst and Vassar. Schools can in fact over-react in certain cases in order to improve their overall image in dealing with sexual assault claims. We know nothing about this, and it’s pretty much impossible to read tea leaves. The University may be on good grounds, it may be BS. We honestly…

He will need that strength to carry the hopes and dreams of Happy Valley through the piss-stained streets of State College.

No, she’s making an effort to go under the radar by clocking a girl who is playing pretty standard defense. It was the implication that somehow she’d been goaded I was reacting to.

I’m so over the sheer dresses and Vikander’s color is awful

I hope everyone spends all day asking him about “Ashley’s” use of HGH and his fucking ridiculous behavior at Tennessee. Let’s roast St. Peyton now that it no longer matters.

So not true. Watched that 3 times now — it’s normal incidental contact every time. The player is dirty in a game they are running away with — I’ll bet she’s lots of fun when they are losing.

You are allowed to check the stick, which is much shallower. That’s why women’s players have to “cradle” the ball to keep it in the stick as they run. Also, you use the body position and the stick — it’s not exactly no contact, as some incidental contact is almost always permitted unless it’s patently dangerous.

All good wishes to you.

Justine small measure of how bad these candidates are — it took fucking Mitt Romney to make this point. Yo! Genius lawyer Cruz, you couldn’t make that point in real time?

Theoretically. You can’t check the body, but you can push off a little, and since you can check the stick, and reach over the head (as long as you don’t violate the sphere —the area around the head.

And it’s an increasingly physical game, though not the excuse for beating the crap out of each other men’s lacrosse is.

Awesome thanks.

This is pretty egregious, but I’ve seen it, even in high school. I’m guessing she didn’t get carded, which is why a pissed off parent or coach has shown up with the video?

Make this team disappear for 5 years please.

It’s done a pretty good job of swaying public opinion hasn’t it? This is now such a mess for Sony and Dr. Creepy they may be more willing to settle and reduce the reputation issues. Also, it’s worth a shot. You never know what judge you get in the first round, and some of them are not as smart or principled as others.…

Thank you! Enjoying this thread enormously. I used to spend a lot of time arguing preliminary injunctions, and the level of miscommunication here has been awful. Nice work you and others.

Sorry, I have trouble with both your definition of racism and understanding of lawyers. To claim they “wield more power” is just flat-out incomprehensible.

Go read the whole thing. The above is pretty selective and misinterpreted.

I wish you were right. But like the man said, 11-1 is all they cared about in the mid-90s and it’s probably still an overwhelming factor in sports in 2016. If anyone other than Al Jazeera had done that PED investigation (and notice, they won’t touch anything involving any famous, likable sports persona), there might…

Maybe you could continue to read the entire thing, where she makes clear she hasn’t judged anything; that this is a preliminary injunction matter and not a discussion of the merits of the case; and that because of that there is almost no evidence which has been submitted. She also notes that there is an understandable…