4 tubes are enough. Though 6 would be ideal with the need for decoys considered
4 tubes are enough. Though 6 would be ideal with the need for decoys considered
perhaps in the next avengers movie we will see a flying submarine. They already got an flying carrier so a sub can’t be that hard.
That was before low interest rates. Why bother getting money from customers when the fed offers it for literally free. Retail banking actually loses them money overall, but is maintained as a form of marketing to keep you in the system.
Aero efficient, I was talking about the missiles. The tube shape isn’t as efficient as say a lifting body would be and decreases effective range of the missile. Which would be possible with the new launch system.
oh look summer whites. The one uniform you can use as a prop to tell sea stories, as every event will leave some kind of un-erasable stain on them.
Locked on? probably not. At that distance, getting locked on by aegis might result in broken electronics and funny looking kids
I find it amusing that the battleship arms race of the 20th century was “won” by the US with computers rather than guns, armor, or engines.
Yay for ACLS mode I?
Defensive mines are really effective against Russian naval intrusions. The Russians, and many other burgeoning powers, lack any significant ability in aerial mine clearing, which is critical for projecting power beyond friendly coastal waters and operating in and enemy’s A2AD zone. Minesweeper ships tend to be slow…
The H-6 is the Chinese equivalent of the Bear. They are going to keep those things flying forever and then after that too.
Yeah this doesn’t make much sense for strike aircraft. Especially strategic bombers.
ooo glossy paint, i know the low vis matte stuff is supposed to be better, but damn if fighters don’t look amazing in glossy finishes and clean configs
i can understand mig 23s as f111 stand ins, but what are the 21’s supposed to be?
As anyone who is into motorsports knows, catching up is the easy part. Passing is a whole other story.
Honestly, this should have happened much sooner, but tanking wasn't as deadly as carrier landings, and didn't affect operations because of weather, so less of a priority. It took less than 10 years to develop and make operational the SPN-10 ALCS. The majority of which was figuring out how to cram in enough analogue…
Changing to engine to a diesel would require a complete redesign of the M1 hull.