dodgycookies
dodgycookies
dodgycookies

if the Air Force didn't have a stick up its butt over fixed wing Army Aviation, the Army would probably have taken in the OV-10 and keep the A-10 flying as well

USN doesn't want to consider SSK's because our allies already have them. If we were to fight say Russia, NATO members combined have quite a few SSK's available for littoral operations while USN/RN/FN SSN's would patrol offshore.

Fundamental differences in military policy. Since Alfred Mahan, the USN is been mainly concerned about projecting power abroad. This reflects in everything from doctrine to hardware procurement.

It does flesh out the ASW component, but most of their destroyers already carry SH60s.

The 3 things you notice about the JMSDF once you get past the name

Yeah formation pictures were terrible, especially if you had to wear service dress in the sun and heat all day.

Funny when "destroyers" are heavier than the Washington Naval Treaty crusier tonnage limit

It is amusing that cruder engineering is now the savior of the AF. The advancement of engineering has allowed for less over engineering and precise design lifetimes. However, when you pair precisely engineered lifetimes with military procurement, you have a train-wreck in the making from day one. The

from the back it would sound like a very intense game of red light green light

All about risk/threat assessment vs cost in the end. And most would say the threat to commercial aircraft is pretty small even over contested territories. Because no one who can shoot down commercial jets at altitude really wants to and tries their best not to. Even for manpads, targeting civilian airliners rarely

The 52's are in a dying spiral and the low man on the totem pole. Weak thirsty engines means more costs and less payload, which means the AF has a case to use platforms like the B-1B more (which they have, a lot). Less missions, gains you less priority and a weaker argument for upgrades.

I feel like this is a return to the 60's when SAC had those BUFFs on airborne alert.

mmm brings back memories of Oregon Trail.

russians don't have cats on their current carrier. Best chance for a cat shot would be the Brazilian Sao Paulo (Foch)

That is the commemorative tail art for 20 years of using the hornet in the RAAF. Hard to tell the squadron from just that. But since they are flying the 2 seater b model, i would assume these are from the No 2 Operational Conversion Unit (OCU) which according to some friends who met the aussies at red flag is

Here's more data to back you up. R9 270x (rebadged Pitcarin 7870) vs R7 260x (rebadged Bonaire 7790) benchmarks.

V Sync provides the smoothness and removes tearing by matching frames from the graphics unit to the refresh cycle of your screen, but can cause input lag and fps drops/stuttering (caused by the console/pc having to wait to sync with the refresh cycle to push the next frame) especially at lower fps. most consoles

The results are hardly surprising and confirms all the other benchmark data about these chips

The results are hardly surprising and confirms all the other benchmark data about these chips

Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.