worth it.

worth it.

PARTS OF THIS WERE PRE-RECORDED, NO?

I was floored by the camera work. It was so spot on and flawless that I bought Julienne’s (I think) theory that parts of this musical were pre-recorded.

Agreed. and, it turns out, Amber is not a very nice person (on TV).

I’m not sure about a tamer bear but Hugh Glass had Fredrickson (?, Tom Hardy) and Birger (kid from The Maze Runner) helping him fight the bear

He definitely deserved it for this film. I’m also glad to see Tom Hardy got nominated. He was equally fantastic.

well, it is petroleum jelly. i guess i’m unclear why this should bother me?

straight up vaseline? it’s a miracle worker.

I sat through 30 minutes of Peppa Pig yesterday. I wanted to die. Honestly, the fuck is that show?

that’s my question - who is going to take it from him? Admittedly I haven’t seen The Danish Girl yet but Damon won’t win over DiCaprio.

ok, this version is adorable.

proportional payments; if the income is 1/3 partner A and 2/3 partner B then partner A pays 1/3 of the bills and partner B pays 2/3rds.

you could do dietbet - it’s basically the same thing but online.

well, actually - he said it in closing which is allowable (albeit a bit shocking).

I’m fairly sure that it’s common knowledge the lead picks his/her top 15ish and then says, “I don’t care who else stays,” and the producers pick the drama queens/kings for ratings.

I really enjoyed the show (as much as outrage can let one enjoy it) but I keep reminding my friends that the documentary makers had a clear story line/point of view of his innocence. At the end of the show, I’m not sure that he didn’t do it but there was likely room for reasonable doubt.

My understanding is that the prosecution did present the evidence but the documentary didn’t cover it. Avery’s trail was six weeks long and the viewers saw (maybe) 3 total hours of the trial footage. We missed a lot of information and testimony.

I did misread your original comment for which I apologize that the response was directed at you (even though it’s still accurate, a point, I think, that we agree on.)

Based on this response, I am led to believe that I misunderstood your original comment...

The First Amendment only protects him from the government infringing on his speech not from his ex-girlfriend making allegations that he abused her on social media.