Results-oriented analysis of decisions FTW. Good Kinja.

Everyone saying that three points would have won the game is a fucking dish rag, because you are assuming that, up by five instead of eight, the Denver play calling (and results), and TOP would have been exactly the same.

Shut up and go eat some cat litter, you incredible nincompoops.

This makes no sense. If you don't think you can pick up a single yard and instead choose to go for a field goal, then how do you think you are later going move the ball down the field to score a go-ahead touchdown?

This is of course the correct take for the blissfully ignorant. Also very hot.

This assumes they knew at that moment they were going to score a TD later, and that Denver would not score again.

I had no problem with it, either time, as a Pats fan, and not just because of “in bill we trust”