That is an option. However, I was replying to a person explicitly accusing the Broncos of cheating, and making a point to expose the illogic of his response.

In short, YOU TOTALLY NAILED ME, BRO! I feel like such a fool for not responding to the imaginary comment you wanted me to respond to, instead of the actual…

The worst is these asshats would be the loudest whiners if the Pats HAD kicked the field goal and lost by 5.

Cause and effect, ftw!

Why can’t option A also include “then rely on my defense to get a stop, and my first-ballot HOF QB to march us downfield for a FG for the win (even if we miss the extra point)”?

Is it because you genuinely thought those were the only two options...or because you intentionally created a disingenuous dichotomy to support…

Why do you hate logic and reason?

Either you support cheating, and therefore must tip your hat to the Broncos. Or you don’t support cheating, and therefore must also condemn the Pats.
Your stance of defending the Pats while chastising the Broncos is logically inconsistent.