distractechemist
distractedchemist
distractechemist

Pictured: What the inside of a house looks like when all the things a kid could potentially ruin have been removed.

You must not have kids.

So what, live in a cave?

That is incorrect, people will at least wear red ribbons and have benefit concerts for people with AIDS.

The huge perk with kettlebells is the bulk of the weight is offset from the handle. Offset weight = more challenging for your core and your grip.

I’ve tried swinging dubmbells like a kettlebell. It does work, but, it’s worse ergonomically and for me at least, dumbbell grips don’t work as well when swinging them. I’m always worried about them loosing from my hand.

Pray tell, are your thoughts and digressions, which I can only assume follow similar lines to the one above, available somewhere on the information superhighway (which, though well-known as a haven for overwrought, I’ll-informed screeds, I still find myself perusing on a frequent basis) on a “weblog” or other sort of

FAIL! I could follow your writing.

To pen an authentic and intellectual cinema review – the kind worthy of publication in America’s snootiest airport magazine – one must remember to include countless, such as it were, asides and clauses, seemingly without a purpose other than rendering one’s prose an inarticulate gruel of half thoughts, all while

This sentence sounds like it was written by a man who wants us to be impressed because he knows a bunch of big words...

That hack Shakespeare never had the vision to make JarJar Binks a galactic senator.

I keep thinking back to my high school English teacher. If I had turned that in as a sentence in an essay, he would have handed it back to me and said “You like to show off? How about you diagram this sentence for the class.”

I have a vague notion but got lost in the mythopoetic stew of shitty writing.

It made a lot more sense once I read this:

The director of “Rogue One,” Gareth Edwards, has stepped into a mythopoetic stew so half-baked and overcooked, a morass of pre-instantly overanalyzed implications of such shuddering impact to the series’ fundamentalists, that he lumbers through, seemingly stunned or constrained or cautious to the vanishing point of

She said she was 61 not 461. No reason to be such a douche. For her having been out of the dating scene for quite some time, she asked a perfectly reasonable question.

That was my thought, as well... Seems like people who’d groom more are also more likely to be the type to have more partners, and therefore, more susceptible to the risks involved.

But is it not because they are more likely to be sexually active and/or open to new partners?