disqustxmmfb3zvy--disqus
Grumpkin
disqustxmmfb3zvy--disqus

Come on… are we really expected to believe she's going to push her shopping cart from Oregon to Charming over night?! Get your head out of your ass. That makes absolutely no sense.

- the Hummel was Rose's favorite and the boy/girl theme of it was probably symbolic of Jax killing his mother and himself. I honestly thought they were going to end on that focus. But, like Return of the King there were many more endings to come.
- I didn't see anything with Jax's foot. Other than Gemma's blood

After they killed Opie i'm ready for and welcome any death. Like Jax I checked out emotionally at that point.

When Gemma was sitting at the truck stop smoking. Vic Mackey waits behind GhostGirl at the vending machine before he gets his orange juice.

I guarantee you that some English major at some 3rd rate university would have made the comparison. In the early seasons the Hamlet/Gertrude/Claudius/Ghost story lines were overwhelming.

Return of the homeless girl was interesting. I thought the last time was supposed to be the last time.

Jesus, it is a toss-up at this point for who is more disliked by this comment section: Sorkin or Libby.

Very well said.

Or Darren Wilson raped you while Bill Cosby sat there and ate curry while the female staffers of the Tonight Show watched him.

Battery actually, but the point stands. You can consent to that which otherwise would be a crime absent consent. His attacker and countless other attendants struck him as an artist he had the ability to withdrawal consent at any point and did not. From a legal standpoint the burden would shift to him to withdrawal

Can't consent be given silently? Can't a total lack of protest be construed as consent or actually BE consent? I'm not saying either of those are true in this case, but to make a blanket statement that consent HAS to be explicit doesn't seem in line with reality.

But for one subsequently deleted comment the tone of the debate has been fairly respectful. I do recognize that there is a risk anytime you are talking about criticism and women for people to cross lines, but so far there haven't been any threats of rape and violence that are sadly becoming common. It seems as though

Both were making an argument about the condescension of the men in their life about their respective beliefs, and hitting the men hard on that. That is where the similarity is.

The criticism about having all of his characters sound like him has been the same for Woody Allen for 40 years, and maybe actors see performing Sorkin's work as more of a challenge because it is more dense and complicated than the average script for Two Broke Girls.

To paraphrase Sorkin from Studio 60 (or maybe Billy Bob in Bad Santa): With that much space to fill they can't all be winners.

That's not unusual for Sorkin, he seems to like Capra and Daniels is the closest he's come to having a leading man in the style of Jimmy Stewart, for specifically in the American President there is actually a conversation about the Capra-esque quality of Sidney Ellen Wade of Virginia visiting the White House for the

To follow up on point 1: Toofer's entire storyline is an elaborate Pranksmen joke.

I kind of feel the need to push back against the idea that Sorkin and his cast are so dismissive of new media. Neal has been a central character of the show, and but for a small dalliance with Bigfoot he has been at the forefront of the show embracing newmedia is a real way.

The Hallie/Jim fight on the balcony reminds me of the Matt/Harriet fight about gay marriage in Studio 60. Hallie was making all of the right points and hitting back at Jim for ridiculing newmedia whereas Harriet was making all of the right points and hitting back at Matt for ridiculing her faith and not being open to

Have we really gotten so lazy and distracted that two and a half lines requires a TL:DR?