Unless the guy is 40 or 50 years old, it still doesn’t make much sense.

There’s literally just one and a half sentences about Marvel in this article.

“with the second season (which aired in May of this year) expanding the focus to another group of teens stranded on an island”

Wait until they Ralph Bohner it.

What MCU film has left a lasting mark on our culture, besides maybe Iron Man? Endgame was briefly the highest grossing movie in the world, and it was practically forgotten after Far From Home released?

It felt different, but that was mostly because they shot it in the UK, instead of the typical Chicago or New York. But it also feels really small, like it’s a set rather than a city. It doesn’t help that there’s so few locations in a 3 hour movie. We go to the Iceberg Lounge like four times.

The car chase was one of the most incoherent action scenes put to film. It’s impossible to tell where anyone is in relation to each other, and there’s no sense of place other than “small stretch of generic highway with mysteriously empty lane.” Somehow, this jet engine muscle car can barely keep up with Penguin’s…

She was an exposition machine in the first movie and a plot device in the second. What was she supposed to do with that?

You think they were bad critics because you disagreed with them on a couple films?

I had some of the same thoughts. The main reviews seem to be colored by hindsight, so I hope to see more of your thoughts in future episode reviews.

Just look at the Kubrick Shining vs the “King approved” Shining to see why.

Halloween Kills is on the level of the average MCU movie.

The fact that you think that the only possible alternatives to comic book movies are “Oscar bait dramas” tells me that your tastes are very, very limited.

They’re making you thirsty?

You think Indy 4 was a creative passion? Spielberg also chose to do Ready Player One, and that was a garbage nostalgia wank fest. I don’t think he has any passion for the big budget action movies he does these days. Or, at least it’s not showing in his work.

Like half the article was about how the actual game development was going. It’s bizarre that you think people wouldn’t and shouldn’t talk about it.

The issue is that good directors don’t seem to want to make a movie out of a videogame. Also, movie studios outright owned the screen rights to their comic book characters, which afforded them the freedom to do what they wanted with them. Videogame publishers are much more protective over their properties. Microsoft…

I hate the recent trend of giving subjects creative control over movies and shows about them. I guess Bohemian Rhapsody making nearly a billion despite being terrible, largely because of May and Taylor’s control, means we won’t see the end of it anytime soon.

“Fun” is such a vague and meaningless descriptor of videogames, and art in general. It’s ridiculously personal, much more so than humor. If you tried to describe what makes a fun game, you would just be listing things in videogames that you personally like.

The problem is these shows are not usually willing to change, like people’s lives do when they go to college or whatever. I like the first few seasons of The Goldbergs, but what little I saw of the later seasons were just embarrassing. Everyone was acting exactly the same, and the show had not changed one iota.