disqustqchfofl7t--disqus
A Olson
disqustqchfofl7t--disqus

It’s weird, because the comic would be perfect for a TV show, just like World War Z.

That’s an extremely bizarre takeaway, considering that almost the entire short up until that point was about how the mom was extremely overprotective and a little possessive.

This was filmed in 2019, well before the cannibal business.

He’s also good in Stretch, which nobody saw. And he was perfect as Nite Owl, even if the movie, itself, missed the point of Watchmen. The worst thing you can do is cast him in a generic leading man role.

It’s not just a retread of the style, because Mando already did an episode or two on how the Sand People aren't actually bad and have their own culture and stuff.

Isn’t this the award show that literally no one takes seriously? The stars show up to get drunk, and you watch to see what wacky thing the stars will say when they’re drunk.

Who gives a shit if he scams some rich idiots, lmao.

I don’t recall where they were said to be inferior. Also, “the bankers are greedy and untrustworthy” is, like, a huge part of left wing messaging.

Rowling has a tight grip on Harry Potter, which is good for two reasons. First, it represents a victory for creatives in the creative/executive battle. Second, it means the property won’t be endlessly spun off.

It's there to attract adults. Same with the voice cast. Kids don't know what a Bono is, but mom and dad do.

That’s only 7.4 million viewers, assuming they watched the entire season. Or 15 million viewers who quit halfway through. Even 74 million viewers who watched one episode and immediately quit is within the realm of possibility, considering that it was advertised on Netflix’s front page.

It’s not pointless at all. It’s important to show the fallout from season 3. It would be completely ridiculous if the ring gate did not change the solar system politics and power balance. Plus, the MCRN revolt is necessary for the Marco storyline and keeping Bobbie on the show.

Christopher Nolan did, at least. And me. That makes at least two.

GTAV makes more in three months than Star Citizen has in 10 years. Why would he pay a ton of money for a massive and growing team to perpetually develop a game, when he could finish the game and fire everyone except a small maintenance team to pump out new ships that people would buy in droves? It’s either

That makes no sense. 700+ employees would be extremely expensive, even if they were all on entry level salaries, not to mention the cost of hiring and training people. GTAV makes $500 million a quarter, so why would he deliberately sabotage the game to make pennies, when he could let the employees finish it and make

How is it fraud? Hiring 700+ developers for years seems like a very inefficient way to steal people's money. Trying and failing is not fraud, and neither is incompetence. You would think that a line of lawyers would be champing at the bit for some of that sweet class action moolah if it was such obvious fraud.

Since when? Bethesda always releases broken games and all of them except Fallout 76 are near-universally acclaimed at release. Did they even get around to fixing the game breaking PS3 save bug?

He *is* autistic, (or, more accurately, has Asperger's,) according to the actor that plays him. I don't know if that's what's on the page, or if he took it upon himself to portray the character that way, but it's too close to be a mere accident. That's not to defend the rest of his acting career, which I have not seen.

I remember finally watching Ghostbusters and wondering why Slimer was a bad guy and barely in it.