disqustqchfofl7t--disqus
A Olson
disqustqchfofl7t--disqus

Like half the article was about how the actual game development was going. It’s bizarre that you think people wouldn’t and shouldn’t talk about it.

The issue is that good directors don’t seem to want to make a movie out of a videogame. Also, movie studios outright owned the screen rights to their comic book characters, which afforded them the freedom to do what they wanted with them. Videogame publishers are much more protective over their properties. Microsoft

I hate the recent trend of giving subjects creative control over movies and shows about them. I guess Bohemian Rhapsody making nearly a billion despite being terrible, largely because of May and Taylor’s control, means we won’t see the end of it anytime soon.

“Fun” is such a vague and meaningless descriptor of videogames, and art in general. It’s ridiculously personal, much more so than humor. If you tried to describe what makes a fun game, you would just be listing things in videogames that you personally like.

The problem is these shows are not usually willing to change, like people’s lives do when they go to college or whatever. I like the first few seasons of The Goldbergs, but what little I saw of the later seasons were just embarrassing. Everyone was acting exactly the same, and the show had not changed one iota.

It’s weird, because the comic would be perfect for a TV show, just like World War Z.

That’s an extremely bizarre takeaway, considering that almost the entire short up until that point was about how the mom was extremely overprotective and a little possessive.

This was filmed in 2019, well before the cannibal business.

He’s also good in Stretch, which nobody saw. And he was perfect as Nite Owl, even if the movie, itself, missed the point of Watchmen. The worst thing you can do is cast him in a generic leading man role.

It’s not just a retread of the style, because Mando already did an episode or two on how the Sand People aren't actually bad and have their own culture and stuff.

Isn’t this the award show that literally no one takes seriously? The stars show up to get drunk, and you watch to see what wacky thing the stars will say when they’re drunk.

Who gives a shit if he scams some rich idiots, lmao.

I don’t recall where they were said to be inferior. Also, “the bankers are greedy and untrustworthy” is, like, a huge part of left wing messaging.

Rowling has a tight grip on Harry Potter, which is good for two reasons. First, it represents a victory for creatives in the creative/executive battle. Second, it means the property won’t be endlessly spun off.

It's there to attract adults. Same with the voice cast. Kids don't know what a Bono is, but mom and dad do.

That’s only 7.4 million viewers, assuming they watched the entire season. Or 15 million viewers who quit halfway through. Even 74 million viewers who watched one episode and immediately quit is within the realm of possibility, considering that it was advertised on Netflix’s front page.

It’s not pointless at all. It’s important to show the fallout from season 3. It would be completely ridiculous if the ring gate did not change the solar system politics and power balance. Plus, the MCRN revolt is necessary for the Marco storyline and keeping Bobbie on the show.

Christopher Nolan did, at least. And me. That makes at least two.

GTAV makes more in three months than Star Citizen has in 10 years. Why would he pay a ton of money for a massive and growing team to perpetually develop a game, when he could finish the game and fire everyone except a small maintenance team to pump out new ships that people would buy in droves? It’s either