disqustqchfofl7t--disqus
A Olson
disqustqchfofl7t--disqus

That makes no sense. 700+ employees would be extremely expensive, even if they were all on entry level salaries, not to mention the cost of hiring and training people. GTAV makes $500 million a quarter, so why would he deliberately sabotage the game to make pennies, when he could let the employees finish it and make

How is it fraud? Hiring 700+ developers for years seems like a very inefficient way to steal people's money. Trying and failing is not fraud, and neither is incompetence. You would think that a line of lawyers would be champing at the bit for some of that sweet class action moolah if it was such obvious fraud.

Since when? Bethesda always releases broken games and all of them except Fallout 76 are near-universally acclaimed at release. Did they even get around to fixing the game breaking PS3 save bug?

He *is* autistic, (or, more accurately, has Asperger's,) according to the actor that plays him. I don't know if that's what's on the page, or if he took it upon himself to portray the character that way, but it's too close to be a mere accident. That's not to defend the rest of his acting career, which I have not seen.

I remember finally watching Ghostbusters and wondering why Slimer was a bad guy and barely in it.

If they cared about what the fans want, they wouldnt have done this show in the first place. Most anime fans do not want live action adaptations. And with how much they’ve already changed, it’s not as if they can claim to be true to the show.

I’m guessing that you have never actually talked to an anime fan, because you couldn’t have been more hilariously wrong if you tried. Anime fans don’t want live action remakes of anything, let alone the stone-cold classics that would be nearly impossible to improve. And because there’s nothing live action can do that

That’s literally a direct quote of the book, LMAO!

Did Melissa Villaseñor turn white when I wasn't looking?

Kal-el, no.

That conclusion makes zero sense. You could really stretch and call them A military, but they are not THE military. People have problems with specific actions of specific organizations. Very, very few people think their country should have no military or method of self-defense whatsoever. Also, you would have to twist

Last time I checked, Pixar is more than capable of making original movies.

“While the answers to problems aren’t military, the answer still is “develop a bigger weapon than the other guy.””

That doesn’t answer anything. It doesn’t say what assistance the military provided, or what, if anything they asked for in return. It includes movies like Karate Kid 2 and Silence of the Lambs, which don’t have any military themes, as far as I’m aware. “Assistance” could be something as small as providing guidance on

“Don’t forget, part of the issue there is that 50% of that movie is trying to say “the military is correct in locking people up”

What? The way they describe it is literally the opposite of that.

Well, it’s had to develop an ensemble when half the movie is action scenes. (Technically, you can develop characters with action, but that requires a lot more creativity.)

Taika Waititi already mostly fit into the Marvel mould. Other than infusing it with some Kiwi pride, the movie was another example of the Marvel formula, albeit a very good example. James Gunn is the same. His “loveable asshole” schtick fits right in a whole cinematic universe full of loveable assholes, as long as he

Like your comment?

Most of these shows use Toon Boom Harmony, which does have the ability to do frame-by-frame animation, along with the rigged puppets that most of these shows use.