By the words he used.
JeffSmith
disqusk7zummreoo--disqus
It wouldn't have tied into civil war the way it did now, they'd have to chart a slightly different path to get there.
She's a huge movie star who can carry a film to success whether it's a licensed property or not.
Actually I thought of one difference - Scarlett Johannsen is a huge movie star, where Chris Evans is a nobody except when he's in a Marvel movie.
explain why it wouldn't work.
The same exact way Winter Soldier did. There's no difference between her and captain america. Instead of him being the one who Nick Fury baptises with the flash drive, make it Scarlett Johannsen, and instead of Bucky Barnes make it some other villain.
It is? Have you seen The Winter Soldier?
Didn't somebody burn a bunch of MGM's back catalog too, because he'd bought them for the casino business and was sick of paying storage for all the old movies?
Yes it is.
… said Dikachu five minutes ago.
I can't argue with your logic.
Sorry, but this is too urgent, you're going to have to remain awake until it completely plays out. Your snark is critical!
Jesus Christ, we're going to jump right to that??
That's a good point.
The counter-argument is Salt, starring Angelina Jolie as a female spy with a complicated past as a double agent who weighs 90 pounds soaking wet and can beat up rooms full of grown men.
Nobody was looking for a Thor movie or a Captain America movie or even an Iron Man movie until they made a good one.
I don't want to speak for him, but what I think he meant about Winter Soldier was that Winter Soldier was not in any way a superhero movie.
Why does her being Black Widow in any way complicate the task of writing a good spy movie?
You'd like to think so, but there are a lot of belligerent assholes trying to force time to go backwards.