ya, I think it was supposed to be the crack growing, but that was a terrible effect.
ya, I think it was supposed to be the crack growing, but that was a terrible effect.
Everyone loves a car crash. They could have had any national trainwreck as the host and gotten the same ratings bump. If they put Mel Gibson on the week his tapes got released, the same thing would have happened.
All his kids are fucked, and he's definitely the one responsible.
The most awkward moment of the night was when Ivanka walked out and there was utter silence and stillness from the audience.
I'm almost as sick of Sia and her stupid wig as I am of Trump and HIS stupid wig.
A thing… like you???
I don't understand this gimmick account.
Muggle definitely doesn't sound like something an American would say - to my American ear it sounds like a British term. But "no-maj" sounds awkward, and not like something that anyone would ever say.
I for one welcome our orange haired, orange skinned alien overlords.
What good are the ratings going to do them exactly? Are there people who don't know about Saturday Night Live? I'm not saying there's a huge negative, but it's not like one night of some more viewers is a big deal either. SNL is going to be renewed for the next million years with or without Donald Trump.
I wouldn't expect SNL to refuse Trump, any more than I'd expect Stephen Colbert to decline him as a guest.
I've presented plenty of evidence and examples. You're exactly what I thought you'd be, because it's always the same story - you have no point that you can articulate, just a bunch of undirected anger about the fact that feminism exists.
and make it good because this is getting repetitive and boring. It's been obvious since the beginning that you have nothing to say.
I didn't intimate it, I said it. Why does it need repeating. If you have some point to make about that, make it.
I'm not going back on anything, your question was meaningless. I'm not going to rephrase my point until you stumble across some phrase that you feel qualified to refute.
The only accusation I'm making is that you're misapplying your sense of outrage.
Obviously, I meant recently in the general sense, meaning it was something that went unnoticed for a very long time and only in the last couple of decades did people start to talk about it. Not literally that this comment section is the first time it's been brought up.
No, I'm going to pretend that it's valid, and a real reason for the grade to dip even lower, because it's something in our culture that hasn't been highlighted, but needs to.
I think they base what they cover on clicks, not quality. If a lot of people are interested in reading about the trainwreck, the AV Club is happy to keep writing about it.
That's something that only came up at the very end of the review, after it was eviscerated for its lack of structure, story, or character development.