Thanks. I don't disagree with you about Trump, but I disagree with you about Hillary. I don't think she'd have been any less of a servent of the rich - more in fact. Just look at how much better funded her campaign was and the way much of the mainstream media went all out for her. She was very much the establishment…

You said you would give him a chance / be more tolerant if you agreed with any of his stated goals. I gave you examples of stated goals from his campaign. That's a very long post to say you didn't mean what you said but rather that you would give him a chance if you trusted him to actually mean his stated goals. Which…

Do you not feel that people promoting claptrap like "Trump supporters are racists" and "Trump is like Hitler" have a responsibility for promoting this divisiveness? Or implications that if you support the right to bear arms you're just waiting for a chance to kill your countrymen?

I'd love to see this go to court. The CIA would have to actually supply some evidence that the Kremlin was behind the disclosure of the emails.

Out of curiosity, how do you see his policies destroying his support base's quality of life as opposed to what Clinton would have done differently?

I would give him a chance if any of his stated goals were things that i support

First of all, I'm a regular poster on the AV Club and I've never seen
you post there before, so please don't refer to me as a troll.

Not really a strawman, more a commentary on how many people said they would move to Canada if Trump won and that he was basically Hitler. Now he has, there's a derth of celebrities doing so or actually behaving as you ought to if the Nazis had just come to power.

"Main Kampf".

An ad hominem is where you attack the person making an argument in place of addressing what they actually say. In this instance I've given a reasoned argument and supported it, and you've responded with comments about how I am looking for ways to "blame mean old liberals". I.e. I make an argument, you make attacks on…

And you're pretending that the financial disincentive is the main motivator for people turning down this gig

Kids really do. Especially Japanese schoolgirls for some reasons.

Best scene for me was, you know… that one. I came here to post Neon Demon myself but I'll just join this little sub-thread. "Best film this year I can't recommend to anyone" is a great description.

So, in your estimation, the vast majority of musicians are actually Trump supporters,

And you are being way too literal minded

Lines like: "don't touch a lamb's wool" and "it's okay for a bunny to call another bunny cute" are direct parallels to racial dialogue. The presence of both male and female bunnies being discriminated against, and indeed males and females in every type of role, undermines the idea that it is presenting species as an…

It's not really surprising. Those against Trump are so vitriolic that if you played at Trump's inauguration you'd lose half your market and have a ready-made army of people to deplore you as a racist online at any opportunity. Which artists would want that? Look what happened to the Dixie Chicks when they dared get…

The smell.

It's not just as easy to turn it into a metaphor for sexism. We see male and female characters all over the place and the prejudice falls along species lines, not sex. Judy's whole family are subject to the same prejudices and behavioural stereotypes regardless of their gender. The presence of actual sexual division…

Totally. Both were amazing.