Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqusj7gezbtvbj--disqus
    K4
    disqusj7gezbtvbj--disqus

    Never seen it, but I know it's popular so if it's been covered in that then maybe my post is redundant. :)

    Well, anyone would feel a bit crestfallen if they were mocked by some girls. The difference is most people wouldn't have the guts to try something different in the first place.

    Quite possibly. Still, it's always seemed frankly bizarre that they claimed to throw his body overboard because "islamic culture… yada". You start respecting it now? Over something this important? Something wasn't right with that. Who knows what - could be anything from the outre statements of the president of

    Very little of the assasination of Bin Laden is well-substantiated. The chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee on the assassinaton reportedly walked out of the movie Zero Dark Thirty because in her own words she "couldn't stand the innaccuracies". Chiefly around the presentation of the CIA's torture as being a

    I watched Ghost Rider II: Spirit of Vengeance once. Nicholas Cage plays a motorcyclist who occasiaonlly turns into a burning skeleton who torments bad people by staring at them. I admire without reservation a person who can give their all to such a role. And Nicholas Cage most certainly does. There's a scene where

    More likely because it allows you to build thin and light subs, rather than any magnetic properties or lack of. Sonar is essentially echo-location (i.e. sound) for specifically underwater.

    This conversation is a little over-simplified. If you're talking E or LSD, that's fun. If we're talking cocaine or heroin… not so much.

    Another thing this article lacks, and I hope you'll forgive me for tagging onto your post but I feel this is important, is their costing of the drugs imported. Their little bit about drugs worth "$100 million but crew paid only $3000 per trip". The drugs are not worth that until they are being sold on the street. It's

    Sounds completely plausible to me…

    >>Explain to me how our bombing of Libya made things worse.

    >>"The question is, and this will be my last post on the matter, how much
    of that is her position and how much of that was her boss' decision?"

    Resonably smart and very poorly educated would be my assessment.

    "Look at me, I'm a politiician… Not really - the power of suggestion!"
    —D. Trump.

    >>"Weird, I believe what people say more than what other people say about them"

    Hillary can deliver on hawkish behaviour. Trump loud-mouthing about nuclear war over a tweet - that's not something I consider plausible. Hell, the CIA would probably kill him before the year is out.

    >>"a 3rd party candidate is not magically more qualified to be POTUS."

    Hahaha! Hillarious. And pretty accurate. :/

    People are so sick of lies and half-answers they'll turn to someone horrifying if they just believe he's not lying to them. We're at the point where people will choose a horrifying statement over no statement at all because people feel powerless and lied to and disenfranchised. Trump says to people "I hear you. I'm

    Great source you found, there! But a little actual reading (instead of twenty seconds of Googling) might get you quotes from people such as Robert Graves (who has written an excellent book called Duty covering his time serving under multiple administrations of both Democrats and Republicans) where he states that

    So her being a strong and outspoken supporter of attacks on Libya, being self-congratulatory after bombing started and having pushed for it (and other actions) is not a guide to how she would behave in office because Obama agreed? The logic of that is flawed. Her aggressive position has been established and doesn't