I think you are right that people got tired of it at last (which is why it got canceled, I guess), although I think many people stuck with it anyway, because, I don't know, sunken cost fallacy? "This has to start to make sense at some point, right?".

In the original drafts, most instances of "I want to believe" was "bazinga!"

To be fair, I'm mostly basing this on what I imagine a typical casual X-Files fan is like, which is my mom.

On one hand, yes, on the other hand "space is hard" from li'l Mulder was pretty fun.

The thing is, I think what many, if not most, X-Files viewers want is the type of episodes that Carter writes.

Wong's episode (the second one) was pretty solid, more standard X-Files-y stuff.

Has anyone written a book explaining geopolitics in terms of The Game?

*uniformed Russians "vacation" outside of your house*

I bet it's constant rejection like this that makes Russians do crazy shit like climbing radio masts and put it on Youtube.

Shit, you are right, it's definitely Shkreli, isn't it?

Well, OK, now I'm sold.

I saw one episode and thought it was almost painfully corny. Maybe it's actually good if you give it a chance, since lot of people seem to have strong feelings about it. On the other hand, there's not a shortage of things to watch…

I think the identities of the parties involved are already fairly well known.

But on the dolls it IS form fitting. They've even bothered to add stretch details.

If the strip of fabric across the crotch isn't thread-thin, how am I supposed to know without doubt that the doll doesn't have a penis?

Is it just me, or do those toys look kind of… masculine? Were they too cheap to make new molds for a female-fronted movie?

And Mercerism, which if anything was the main point of the book.

He might have liked it better if he had working speakers.

If I remember right, the book is clear (well, as clear as a Philip K Dick novel can be) that Deckard is human.

Could God create a comment that not even Xhe could find problematic?