Also, you know, almost 40 episodes in you would figure that most viewers/critics have figured out that this show will never let go of this 'one step forward/two steps back'-formula. And yet, it keeps coming up as this huge point of critisism. Which seems hardly qualified this late into the show.

These little Deadwood reunions warm my heart, every time they do them. Unfortunately SoA sucked most of the way and FTWD I stopped watching after season one, so sadly I can't enjoy them.

It's honestly one of the best comedy movies I have ever seen. Can't count how many times I put the DVD in over the years. And it still makes roar with laughter.

He's one of those actors you look at and wonder 'How does that guy have a career?'

You need to see Police Squad. One of the funniest shows ever made, if you're into this kind of nonsense-humor.

There is actually a pretty good video on youtube where Ebert and Siskel discuss film critisism and how important it is (in Ebert's words) 'to give the film its own day in court'. By that I think he meant exactly what you wrote about.

So? Really, Silicon Valley is also nothing more than a procedural pretending to do an ongoing storyline with a fixed end game in mind. If that is what you meant.

Honest question: What do you mean by childlike?

We can sue God? That's great news. Because now I can finally blame someone for these short, stubby legs of mine. Aside from my parents, that is.

These new Avatar posters look fantastic!

No, no. Nothing to apologize for. You are exactly right with every single thing you said. I had the exact same thoughts for years now, but have never expressed them in such a dense, well-spoken manner. Kudos to you, my friend.

Frankly, I mostly skip the reviews these days and jump right to the comments, which are usually much more insightful, anyway. There's just too much blaaaah there, which would be fine, if most of them weren't just lazy write-ups. Reviews should be short and to the point and it shouldn't require as much time to read…

I'm not sure he ever was.

So, he single-handedly ruined that Star Trek movie? And Prometheus? And the half dozen other writers that worked on WWZ had nothing to do with anything?

*Eh-hem*

You know what? I wholeheartedly agree with that sentiment.

Also all the problems of Brad Bird Tomorrowland, I pretty much blame Lindelof

I know. I guess I'm not fatigue enough to still be frustated with them.

And a lot of people share that dread. I guess it's good to have a healthy doese of sceptisism about these things - especially when the production process has been as shaky as this one's been - but I also think that you shouldn't judge the book by its cover. Or rather a tv show before you've seen it. I mean, sure it…

My point? You're the one who wanted perspectives from species other than from Vulcans in the new show. There are other species apart from Vulcans on the new show. Just wanted to let you know.