Why is Culpepper hated yet Malcolm so beloved? Malcolm is more arrogant, more broey, and Brad never go outsmarted by Ice Cream Scooper Erik of all people.

Woo's choice was Kass not the charisma black hole he went out 4th.

Keeping the "strong players" might be a valid idea if the teams are relatively even but this is such a mismatch in the strength department. Malcolm is not even in Ozzy's class in survivor challenges and you throw in JT, Culpepper and Sierra that is going to get you big leads most of the time.

How are all the big moves working now? Tony played an entertaining game last time but there was a reason that type of game or anything even remotely resembling it has won only once. And the person that pushed the idea of survivor being a game of Big Moves went right before this.

I cant find a single example of a clearly better game player losing to a player that the cast liked in the 32 seasons the show has been on. The closest example would probably be season 1 and its not like Kelly was beloved by the cast members.

Even there. In the interviews Tony was liked by most of the people on the jury. Woo on the other hand apparently keeps to himself to a large degree and no one know him.

That is because a bitter jury just means a jury that person doesn't agree with in most cases. If we are going to make a rating system of bitter juries with Survivor All Stars as a 10 then this jury is a 1 or 2. The only one bitter was voting for Aubry and was voted out of the jury.

This. Look at all the hate Michelle is getting because obviously she is a dumb beauty and didn't deserve it. But hey I guess we have to give the plane woman a million because she is plane and that makes the internet happy. Who cares that she made no attempt at relationships with most of the jury.

Survivor is not a game of "BIG MOVES" its a game of relationships. The person that actually made the tightest relationships with the most people won. Shockingly. Michelle made the right moves when she needed to like when her name was on the block and then when she played Audrey like a fiddle having her give up whom…

You MRI types don't understand anything about how science works do you guys? BMI is a valid measure of health risk which is shown by the mountain range of peer reviewed evidence. Don't you have some women to hate?

Stop hating healthy women because they turn you down. All you MRA are the same hating women for rejecting you.

I don't know them and they are not my friend. But if you want to play this game let me guess you are one of those MRA types that hate healthy weight BMI women because they turn you down.

I didn't call fat people unhealthy. The peer reviewed research did. I called the women that are being dehumanized by the writers of this piece healthy weight because that is what 18.5-24.9 BMI range is called.

He has 2 upvotes.

They use language that dehumanizes normal/healthy BMI women and they get applauded for it. This article does the same thing using dehumanizing language towards normal BMI women and they are brave speaking truth to power.

OK where is the fat hate there? What I do hate is those that profit from lying to people using anti science.

This is just a libelist comment. I welcome people to look at my comment history because their is no such comments about fat people, your word. What there seems to be is an attack on me because I am defending women from dehumanizing language as I pointed out above.

You would shoot flames out of your eyeballs if I called it Normal weight range also.

It is related to the topic because I got the quote from this very article. That quote was not even about Ally McBeal it was about lead roles for women in general on TV. What network show has a woman that is even close to Ally McBeal size today? Not Empire, not BBT, Not Grey, not Criminal Minds, None of the Chicago…

Which gets us back to at least 1 of the authors of this piece having a dislike for healthy weight women see the quote I referenced.